Hello all,
Recently we added our Code of Conduct
<https://github.com/fluid-project/infusion/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md>
and Contributor Guidelines
<https://github.com/fluid-project/infusion/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md> to
the Infusion <https://github.com/fluid-project/infusi
Hi everyone,
No -1 votes were received, and we have positive support for the Code of Conduct
documented here:
https://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Inclusion+in+the+Fluid+Community
<https://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Inclusion+in+the+Fluid+Community>
I have updated the t
1 for any last comments or refinements. If we
don't receive any -1 votes (which must be accompanied by a rationale and a
viable alternative proposal) by then, we will go ahead and implement this code
of conduct.
Colin
---
Colin Clark
Lead Software Architect,
Inclusive Design Research Ce
olin (ccl...@ocadu.ca
> <mailto:ccl...@ocadu.ca>) wrote:
>
>> Hi Justin,
>>
>> I agree—this wiki page is a nice place to refer to the code of conduct from,
>> and should be the place where refer people to.
>>
>> As for the advocacy group, my personal p
:39 AM, Justin Obara wrote:
Hi Colin,
Thanks for writing that up. I really like the wiki page. I assume this is
the case, but just to clarify, I hope that we will keep the adopted code of
conduct with the contents of this wiki page because I feel that it
expresses us as a community.
In regards
Hi Justin,
I agree—this wiki page is a nice place to refer to the code of conduct from,
and should be the place where refer people to.
As for the advocacy group, my personal preference is to keep things as simple
as possible, and avoid having to regularly nominate or vote if possible. Do you
y
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Clark, Colin <mailto:ccl...@ocadu.ca>> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that we've had a month or so to contemplate the many issues involved in
> adopting a code of conduct in our community, I've written up a wiki page that
> summar
Hi Colin,
Thanks for writing that up. I really like the wiki page. I assume this is
the case, but just to clarify, I hope that we will keep the adopted code of
conduct with the contents of this wiki page because I feel that it
expresses us as a community.
In regards to the advocacy group, is it
all,
>
> Now that we've had a month or so to contemplate the many issues involved
> in adopting a code of conduct in our community, I've written up a wiki page
> that summarizes our discussion and the proposed Contributor Covenant CoC:
>
> https://wiki.fluidproject.or
Hi all,
Now that we've had a month or so to contemplate the many issues involved in
adopting a code of conduct in our community, I've written up a wiki page that
summarizes our discussion and the proposed Contributor Covenant CoC:
https://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Inclus
A really interesting discussion! For now I wanted to share a couple of thoughts.
I’d like to suggest that when we do create our code of conduct we include
something in our list of “expected behaviours” that encourages us to call each
other out on unacceptable behaviour. And by calling each other out
Hi All,
A really interesting discussion! For now I wanted to share a couple of thoughts.
I’d like to suggest that when we do create our code of conduct we include
something in our list of “expected behaviours” that encourages us to call each
other out on unacceptable behaviour. And by calling
; Hey everyone,
>
> Codes of conduct have started to show up in a lot of open source
> communities as a very unfortunately result of discriminatory behaviour. As
> they have become more common, people often use the existence (or lack of) a
> code of conduct to decide whether or not th
to your list is this:
* Try to adopt a code of conduct, if possible, that people are already familiar
with so that there is less need to explain, justify, reiterate, or bikeshed the
expectations if possible. We might want to add a little addendum or addition if
we feel it's necessary for ou
appreciate all of the feedback, ideas, inspirations, thoughts,
and etc. that everyone has shared thus far, and I hope that we can hear
from more people in the community as well.
I’d like to add further clarification regarding the blog post I linked to: “Why
the Open Code of Conduct Isn’t for Me
<h
amiliarity with the issues at stake in community
engagement. We agree that a code of conduct shouldn't be used to short-circuit
the "fertile muck" of diversity.
A code of conduct like the Contributor Covenant is not a prescriptive set of
rules. Instead, it's a description o
>
>> I think Michelle was getting at the importance of recognizing that certain
>> actions can open the sphere of mutual and safe collaboration, dissent,
>> disagreement, while some others can foreclose or antagonize it.
>
> Again, I don’t know Shawn M. I do think that he should have a chance
ur that prevent
> this are recognized and addressed without stigmatization? I think that's
> exactly your point about why it's important for a code of conduct to be
> relatively clear in scope and to address specific kinds of behaviour, am I
> right?
Exactly! Yes! Precise
re that the patterns of behaviour that prevent this are recognized and
addressed without stigmatization? I think that's exactly your point about why
it's important for a code of conduct to be relatively clear in scope and to
address specific kinds of behaviour, am I right?
Thi
I think Colin puts the goals well at the end of his post (I share all of them),
and I agree with Michelle that this is about "communicating how we already
behave".
Along with that, I think part of the reason for adopting a code of conduct is
that it aligns us with the larger world
with most of the Open Code of
Conduct." It’s at least a point of commonality from which we might have some
understanding of his points. Awareness of systemic inequality is throbbing
through our thoughts and all of our work — with that in mind, I think Shawn M
is saying that intent m
There are some issues with the blog post you quoted, from an Inclusive Design
perspective.
To start with, the author dismisses the idea of a code of conduct as 'political
correctness’. This is very disturbing because when you break it down, it seems
like it is saying that ‘there are thi
s way at all. I think these are the two
excerpts that best address the issue scope in the Contributor Covenant:
"Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or
reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions
that are not aligned to this
Hi everyone,
Would it be useful to do a community or a design crit to help us formulate a
code of conduct? I feel that given the diverse perspectives and input on the
matter it could be beneficial to go through a design process similar to all our
other projects.
* Brainstorm
* Draft (the
it provides specific descriptions of acceptable and
>> unacceptable behaviour, explicit acknowledgement that these values apply to
>> both digital and in-person situations, and it's a living document that has
>> had a number of versions released over the last several years.
&
ed under "Our Responsibilities"—we may wish to specifically
> acknowledge resources, design artefacts and conversations as well.
>
> By the way, I love this section in the Citizen Code of Conduct!
>
> "Communities mirror the societies in which they exist and posit
bilities"—we may wish to specifically
acknowledge resources, design artefacts and conversations as well.
By the way, I love this section in the Citizen Code of Conduct!
"Communities mirror the societies in which they exist and positive action is
essential to counteract the many forms o
quick googling for codes of conduct I came across "Why the
Open Code of Conduct Isn’t for Me
<http://dancerscode.com/blog/why-the-open-code-of-conduct-isnt-for-me/>"
that was posted as a response to a code of conduct adopted by GitHub. I
probably don’t completely agree with everything
; On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Michelle D'Souza <mailto:michelle...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Codes of conduct have started to show up in a lot of open source communities
> as a very unfortunately result of discriminatory behaviour. As they have
> become
nately result of discriminatory behaviour. As
> they have become more common, people often use the existence (or lack of) a
> code of conduct to decide whether or not they will participate in a
> community.
>
> Given that our community has always been open and welcoming and has
> incl
Hey everyone,
Codes of conduct have started to show up in a lot of open source communities as
a very unfortunately result of discriminatory behaviour. As they have become
more common, people often use the existence (or lack of) a code of conduct to
decide whether or not they will participate
31 matches
Mail list logo
