fluxus
sex
- Original Message -
From: "allen bukoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 2:40 PM
Subject: FLUXLIST: Fwd: Museum of Sex is proud to co-sponsor THE 2nd ANNUAL
NEW YORK BURLESQUE FESTIVAL
> in the email today..
Please correct away if I say anything that strikes you as wrong, but my
impression of fluxus is that it generally has a familial or congenial
flavor to it. It's more demonstrative than evocative. Its mystery, to
me, doesn't induce me to want to demystify it, but to leave it be as it
is. Its
I think you are missing something, Allen. -Don
_
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
Alan,
have you seen Orfice Flux Plugs by Larry Miller 1974, a fluxkit Hannah Higgins
talks about in her book Fluxus Experience (p.34)
she states,"the scale of the individual plugs invites the user to hold and finger
them: to unroll condoms; to consider soft, small plugs for insertion into the nos
in the email today...
Question: why does SEX/sensuality/eroticism and Fluxus seem to be in opposite corners
(or is it just me)? Are/were historical Fluxus performances/objects/games/activities
devoid of sexuality--even the ones that seemed to address gender or sexuality issues
(or is that ju
5 matches
Mail list logo