Re: FLUXLIST: Re: thingist What actually IS wrong w/ the Art World

2000-11-04 Thread Terrence Kosick
er 03, 2000 10:30 AM Subject: FLUXLIST: Re: thingist What actually IS wrong w/ the Art World Terrence writes; To achieve such ends it could be merely the application of a network way of thinking. Formal application of art for culture has ended up in museums that protect it from the people.

FLUXLIST: Re: thingist What actually IS wrong w/ the Art World

2000-11-03 Thread Terrence Kosick
Terrence writes; To achieve such ends it could be merely the application of a network way of thinking. Formal application of art for culture has ended up in museums that protect it from the people. Most of the largest institutions are buildings whose donators are from periods where there was

Re: FLUXLIST: Re: thingist What actually IS wrong w/ the Art World

2000-11-03 Thread Aaron Kimberly
Aaron, what a ramble. - Original Message - From: Terrence Kosick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; list [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; alex galloway [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 10:30 AM Subject: FLUXLIST: Re: thingist What actually IS wrong w/ the Art Wor

Re: FLUXLIST: Re: thingist What actually IS wrong w/ the Art World

2000-11-03 Thread David Baptiste Chirot
Estimado Terrence: Do you participate in Mail Art? I think you wd find many of the ideas and energies you are "for" in vibrant swing there--as well as the debates related to this one here-- for example see the Open Debate of Mail Art to which over