>> Has anybody started on an (x86) 64-bit port of the code generator? I
>> would like to collaborate if someone is working on this.
>
> I'd identified that as my next fonc-related task, but haven't really
> started on it, and may not get a chance to work on it in the next couple
> of weeks. But if
AST = Abstract Syntax Tree?
On 7/22/08, Michael FIG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ian Piumarta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Jolt3 will also use a single framework for top-down parsing of
>> source, intermeditate AST-to-AST
>> analysis/transformation/optimisation, and bottom-up tree rewr
Wouldn't this whole thing be better written in Smalltalk than in gcc?
gcc is more portable?
Couldn't Smalltalk output assembler that gcc could then compile?
I saw an assembler written in Smalltalk once. Hope I still have it.
It was very simple and clean looking.
I am writting a compiler for a l
Kjell Godo wrote:
> AST = Abstract Syntax Tree?
>
Yes.
___
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
I think that (part of) the point is to be able to bootstrap with minimal
tool support, and thereafter to be self-supporting. The bootstrap
process is described better than I can in Section 6.1 of "Accessible
Language-Based Environments of Recursive Theories", available on the
VPRI website. C is d
Hello Joshua,
Saturday, August 23, 2008, 9:42:38 AM, you wrote:
> I think that (part of) the point is to be able to bootstrap with minimal
> tool support, and thereafter to be self-supporting. The bootstrap
> process is described better than I can in Section 6.1 of "Accessible
> Language-Based E
Hello Kjell,
Saturday, August 23, 2008, 2:09:01 AM, you wrote:
> Does COLA fonc run on Windows?
You should be able to compile it on cygwin (http://www.cygwin.com/).
--
Best regards,
Derekmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNA, SCSA, SCNA, LPIC, MCP certified
-- Backup not
Hi all,
Bit of a newbie question:
I'm at Camp Smalltalk at the ESUG conference, and I'm starting to work
on writing an x86_64 code generator for Jolt2. I played around with
Pepsi a couple of years ago, enough to get a basic idea of how it's put
together.
However, I'm pretty much just starting o
Are Jolt macros Object Oriented?
In picoLARC most of the macros are Object Oriented and are called
by message passing in exactly the same way that all other message
passing is done. Programmers are just Objects that return
trees of syntax Objects which can then be compiled. Programmers
are calle
Okay I want to compile it on cygwin.
Which version of fonc should I use?
What is Jolt? What is Coke? What is Pepsi? Cola is Lisp
plus Smalltalk right? Plus a lot of weird stuff like variables
that are macros and weird stuff like that.
Is there a debugger I can use to step through its execution?
A
So what you're saying is that the idc which is written in C
compiles C like code into machine code?
And then that machine code compiles Smalltalk like idst/Pepsi
into machine code? The idst/Pepsi compiles itself into machine
code. And this bootstrapping happens over and over again and
not just on
"Kjell Godo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So what you're saying is that the idc which is written in C
> compiles C like code into machine code?
idc is written in Pepsi. You may be confused because the bootstrap
.o.c files are included in the SVN checkout, at least until idc
targets Coke instead
12 matches
Mail list logo
