https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262410
Akira TAGOH changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ta...@redhat.com|ngomp...@gmail.com
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262410
--- Comment #11 from Łukasz Patron ---
(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #10)
> Well, I'd say this is mpv issue actually. I see they intentionally ignore
> lang object in a fontconfig cache and process fonts in their own way.
> Picking up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262410
Akira TAGOH changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|mpv |libass
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262410
--- Comment #13 from Łukasz Patron ---
(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #12)
> Sorry, correctly libass. see
> https://github.com/libass/libass/blob/
> 649a7c2e1fc6f4188ea1a89968560715800b883d/libass/ass_fontconfig.c#L209
>
> > Are they r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
Akira TAGOH changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262410
--- Comment #14 from Łukasz Patron ---
(In reply to Łukasz Patron from comment #13)
> (In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #12)
> > Sorry, correctly libass. see
> > https://github.com/libass/libass/blob/
> > 649a7c2e1fc6f4188ea1a8996856071580
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262410
--- Comment #15 from Akira TAGOH ---
Well, not that easy to fix. It seems that they use FC_CHARSET to check the
coverage and select a font (see
https://github.com/libass/libass/blob/master/libass/ass_fontselect.c#L722 and
https://github.com/li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051859
Dr Anirban Mitra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mitra_anirban@yah |needinfo-
|oo.co.i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(ta...@redhat.com)
--- Com
