https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240646
--- Comment #5 from Peng Wu ---
Please open another bug for the XeTeX issue, thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240646
Report this comment as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240646
aki...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aki...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240646
Peng Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|38 |39
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240646
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240646
--- Comment #3 from Peng Wu ---
I just removed the Conflicts from the RPM spec files.
URL: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-90417fbb0e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240646
--- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH ---
For a workaround, we could drop Conflict lines in both
google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts and google-noto-sans-cjk-vf-fonts and install
google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts.
Fortunately this still works as a workaround for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240646
Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Red Hat Issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240646
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproj
