DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9054] - PDF Tc Text operator BUG

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: xml-fop/docs/examples runtests.bat

jeremias2002/06/07 13:14:30 Modified:docs/examples Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain runtests.bat Log: Fixed classpath. Xerces was wrong. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.11.2.5 +1 -1 xml-fop/docs/examples/ru

cvs commit: xml-fop/docs/examples/fo textdeko.fo

jeremias2002/06/07 13:13:25 Modified:docs/examples/fo Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain textdeko.fo Log: Added a few samples of letter-spacing attribute. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.3.4.4 +5 -0 xml-fop/

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/render/pdf PDFRenderer.java

jeremias2002/06/07 13:12:35 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/render/pdf Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain PDFRenderer.java Log: Removed Tc that were inserted in [...] TJ commands. (Bug 9054) Instead, fixed letter-spacing. Completed javadocs Pretty-print using JRefact

Re: Status on http://xml.apache.org/fop/index.html

On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 15:14, patrick andries wrote: > [PA] Don't take my remarks wrong : I don't mind not having much information, > I just don't want to be misled. I do simply not understand the sentence. > > What is « this » in « this is roughly » ? Do you mean that the redesign will > end up w

Re: [REDESIGN - LAYOUTMGR] Status request/update

Hi Karen, I'm not really doing any layout stuff at the moment. I wanted to get some movement in those other areas. So the layout stuff is open. I gather you have the ideas on how it should be put together. I hoping the structure handler stuff will be able to be hooked up to provide the ASAP proc

[GUMP] Build Failure - xml-fop

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml init-avail: init-filters-xalan2: [copy] Copying 1

Re: Status on http://xml.apache.org/fop/index.html

- Original Message - From: "Keiron Liddle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "FOP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> 3) What does the following paragraph mean ? >> >> « Development for 1.0DR1 is addressing the design issues for layout and performance. This is focusing on making it possible to be conformant

Re: SAX, fopservlet and 0.20.2

J: Thanks - that clarifies it. The newer xalan did and, with the upgrade to the newer fop and the namespace fix, it is now working (although I had to rename my servlet from fop to fop.pdf to get the pdf output in IE). I now have to work on performance - my users don't like waiting 30min to and

Re: Status on http://xml.apache.org/fop/index.html

On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 16:03, patrick andries wrote: > I think it was about a month ago, a status section was added to the FOP main page. A >good idea. > > Four questions : > > 1) Could it be possible to add a date to this status : "[last updated >xx-March-2002]" ? Yes > 2) Could it be possib