Re: plan for 0.20.5 release

2002-11-09 Thread Peter B. West
Oleg, Thanks for that. I have noticed that there are quite a few people who do respond on dev-user, in addition to yourself and Keiron, which is why I wondered whether Joerg was making a specific request. I eventually concluded he was not. Peter Oleg Tkachenko wrote: Peter B. West wrote:

Re: plan for 0.20.5 release

2002-11-09 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Christian Geisert wrote: [Thanks for the gratulations and now back to FOP (with permission from my wife ;-)] Welcome to the club :) The CHANGES files needs to be updated. Best thing would be if everybody documents his own changes, if not I'll try to do it from the cvs-commit messages Here are

Re: plan for 0.20.5 release

2002-11-09 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Peter B. West wrote: If you haven't already left, which questions did you have in mind? Is it your practise to monitor dev-user for questions which nobody else picks up? Is that the role you want someone else to take over? I believe he had meant exactly that. People on fop-user seem to help

OT: GRE...WOOHOO!

2002-11-09 Thread Rhett Aultman
Thank you very much to everyone who wished me well on my GRE exam. Thanks to the new computer scoring system, my scores come back to me instantly now, so I knew what I got when I finished the test. I scored quite well and will probably get my choice of good graduate schools because of it.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13968] - FontConfig appends "null" to current dir with version 2.04

2002-11-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Feature Request: font-dir

2002-11-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Ah, found you. I've implemented this in CVS. Instead of "baseDir" you can now use "fontBaseDir" to specify a separate directory/URL. And as you suggested I've implemented a fallback to baseDir. On 23.10.2002 23:14:50 John Gentilin wrote: > I am currently working on a project where FOP is embedded

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14408] - [PATCH] XSL-FO Compliance Document

2002-11-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14408] New: - [PATCH] XSL-FO Compliance Document

2002-11-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: plan for 0.20.5 release

2002-11-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 08.11.2002 22:34:35 Christian Geisert wrote: > [Thanks for the gratulations and now back to FOP > (with permission from my wife ;-)] We hope this stays that way. :-) > OK, > I'm planing to do the following things for the next maintenance release > > Fix for bug #7587 (color problems with jpe