--- Simon Pepping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Jeremias]
> > In the end it will probably have to result in
> something similar as EXSLT
> > where for widely accepted features a common syntax
> is defined. BTW, if I
> > remember correctly.ah yes:
> http://exslfo.sourceforge.net/
>
Oh I didn't
Glen Mazza wrote:
There *might* be
more subtle issues
Just do the change locally, run the test suite (well...),
see if anything important breaks. If not, check in.
J.Pietschmann
Simon Pepping wrote:
We might also implement rx:meta-info instead of forcing users to
produce fox:meta-info or rx:meta-info depending on their intended FO
processor.
Fiddling with other people's namespaces is considered unpolite, at
least. They might not like this.
Processor specific extensions are
Team,
FOP's fo.FOText class is used for text nodes (PCDATA)
found within the processing stream.
For example, with:
This sentence is really
simple.
"This sentence is ", "really", and " simple." become
three separate FOText instances.
We have this class extending FObj but I would like to
have
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:55:08PM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> That's a good idea. I don't think RenderX could do anything against us
> adding such a similar feature, unless they have a patent filed on that
> particular feature which will (hopefully!!!) be difficult. Sooner or
> later we will n
On Oct 8, 2004, at 4:21 PM, Christian Geisert wrote:
Clay Leeds schrieb:
Sounds good to me. What do we need to do to make it so?
See http://wiki.apache.org/general/HowToMakeWikiAdminRequests
and http://wiki.apache.org/general/UseModMigration
Christian
Looks like I'll need to become a member of 'aps
On Oct 9, 2004, at 1:30 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
While we're talking about volunteers, when the resolution passes we
will
have some work to do, creating a charter, setting up a website for XML
Graphics which will link to the two existing websites under XML and a
few other things. I intent to do
That's a good idea. I don't think RenderX could do anything against us
adding such a similar feature, unless they have a patent filed on that
particular feature which will (hopefully!!!) be difficult. Sooner or
later we will need something like that. Dave White is quite right to ask
for an extensio
Incidentally, RenderX has a nice extension called
rx:meta-info that holds the PDF document information
of Author, Producer, Title, etc. We provide that
functionality programmatically to the user by
providing methods in FOUserAgent, but the RenderX
method seems better because nondevelopers can use
OK -- PDF 1.4 it is. I agree with supporting Acrobat
V5. However, I don't see backwards compatibility
concerns as much of an issue here, given the Acrobat
Reader is free and pretty easy to download.
Thanks,
Glen
--- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have a particular reason
Do you have a particular reason for this? A feature that you need from
1.5? Most of the people I know who are users of Adobe Acrobat are still
with version 5 which uses PDF 1.4. Only a small number of people have
upgraded their Acrobat Reader to version 6. Start time of AR6 is a PITA
so I personall
Thanks, Clay and Christian, for taking care of this.
I'm also still waiting for the TLP go. From certain statements I
expected the resolution to pass last week, but I guess they're busy. The
next regular board meeting is on Wed, 20 Oct 2004. I'm inclined to give
them a chance until right after the
12 matches
Mail list logo
