Hi Mark
We'd love to have you with us.
On 17.01.2005 05:18:23 Mark Brucks wrote:
I'd like to join the fop development group. I've been an xsl/fop user
for the last year or so (generating PDF), but several new projects I'm
proposing have a need for a robust and complete awt renderer, and
Peter,
it's ok if you make other people aware of your project but the way you
did that in your last post disturbs me. We know that you disagree with
FOP's approach, but I would have preferred a more constructive form of
making Mark aware of Defoe. Maybe I'm overreacting...
On 17.01.2005 06:01:27
I've just checked in a bunch of changes for block-containers complete
with test cases. I'd appreciate if someone could run these tests and
check if I'm interpreting correctly.
The whole start-indent inheritance thing is quite interesting as it
produces strange effects from a stylesheet
Jeremias,
Do you disagree with the assessment? Clearly people might, but I didn't
say anything I don't believe is the truth about the state of FOP. If it
is true, isn't it fair to let newcomers know the state of play? Finn
has already talked about a radically different approach in order to
Peter,
this is not about the question whether I disagree with the assessment.
You might be right, you might be wrong. I can't tell, yet, because I'm
still working my way into the new layout engine. My reaction was
triggered by the way you said these things, not by any technical
statement. But as
Peter,
FWIW, I was shocked by the tone of your statement as well. Not so much
by any misleading or such. Rather, it was more in the way that I'm
shocked by the manner that, in the US companies can discuss differences
with other products in their advertisements.
Had you also 'advertised' FOray
(Don't let Peter rattle you, Jeremias--he's just
jealous that I've found more XSL spec bugs than him.
;)
Our delays are mostly related to advanced issues
concerning layout, and the type of parser used doesn't
have much effect on this issue. So I don't share
Peter's conviction that FOP is in
Glen Mazza wrote:
(Don't let Peter rattle you, Jeremias--he's just
jealous that I've found more XSL spec bugs than him.
;)
You have a lead I am unlikely to overhaul.
Our delays are mostly related to advanced issues
concerning layout, and the type of parser used doesn't
have much effect on this
I've considering embedding FOP is a product I'm developing.
How stable and complete is the puppy?
--
Charles H. Griswold III
Managing Partner
LogixPartners, Inc.
Charles,
I believe this is more a question for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
([EMAIL PROTECTED] to subscribe), but...
On Jan 17, 2005, at 8:30 AM, Charles Griswold wrote:
I've considering embedding FOP is a product I'm developing.
How stable and complete is the puppy?
One of my clients found it stable
Web Maestro Clay,
You can add my name to the list of people who intend to use FOP as part
of a larger product/service... FOP has a perfectly positioned
functionally to meet the needs of may application developers We are
very interested in you perception of where the project is currently.
On Jan 17, 2005, at 8:46 AM, Paul Hill wrote:
Web Maestro Clay,
You can add my name to the list of people who intend to use FOP as
part of a larger product/service... FOP has a perfectly positioned
functionally to meet the needs of may application developers We
are very interested in you
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:38, The Web Maestro wrote:
Charles,
I believe this is more a question for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
([EMAIL PROTECTED] to subscribe), but...
On Jan 17, 2005, at 8:30 AM, Charles Griswold wrote:
I've considering embedding FOP is a product I'm developing.
How stable and
Victor Mote wrote (on November 28, 2004):
The code in the fop-maint branch is code that has not yet been peeled
off into a FOray module. All of it eventually will be. The case of the
app
module, which will eventually contain the API that you are looking for
is in an especially bad state
I have been on the e-mail list since June 2004 Its been an
interesting project to track.
Paul
-
The Web Maestro wrote:
On Jan 17, 2005, at 8:46 AM, Paul Hill wrote:
Web Maestro Clay,
You can add my name to the list of people who intend to use FOP as
part of a
Yes, I think that's my fault. I believe that was
related to the space-before and space-after properties
which I was trying (unsuccessfully) to fix. This is a
very complex portion of the code.
Glen
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jeremias2005/01/17 10:59:50
Modified:
No problem. I stumbled upon it when I realized that I wasn't handling
space-before|after correctly in in-flow block-containers. I'll see if I
can do something about it.
On 17.01.2005 20:17:35 Glen Mazza wrote:
Yes, I think that's my fault. I believe that was
related to the space-before and
Hi Renaud,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 11:46:10PM +0100, Renaud Richardet wrote:
*** documentation ***
please could you tell me about the state of the following documentations:
- xml.apache.org/fop/dev: this documentation refers to 0.20, right?
dev/implement.html is a short writeup of the then
18 matches
Mail list logo
