Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Speaking of which, how does the file created by '-at' differ from the
file generated by running xalan.bat?
That's the Area Tree XML: The layouted pages serialized to a proprietary
XML format. It's only interesting for debugging purposes (in layout
engine development).
And
On 23.06.2003 19:33:23 Clay Leeds wrote:
> On 6/23/2003 10:19 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Nice idea, but there's a problem. The xsl namespace gets filtered out by
> > the XSLT engine, or IOW expanded to the FO attributes before they reach
> > FOP. FOP never sees anything with the xsl: prefix.
>
On 6/23/2003 10:19 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Nice idea, but there's a problem. The xsl namespace gets filtered out by
the XSLT engine, or IOW expanded to the FO attributes before they reach
FOP. FOP never sees anything with the xsl: prefix.
Does this mean that just about every fo:block in the inte
Nice idea, but there's a problem. The xsl namespace gets filtered out by
the XSLT engine, or IOW expanded to the FO attributes before they reach
FOP. FOP never sees anything with the xsl: prefix.
On 23.06.2003 18:51:45 Clay Leeds wrote:
> Forgive my intrusion, and perhaps this is not related, or j
On 6/23/2003 3:08 AM, J.U. Anderegg wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
How do you plan to handle RTF styles?
In jfor we defined an extension to XSL-FO (the "jfor-style" attribute)
to control RTF styles.
I think some form of extension is needed as (AFAIK) the concept of
styles does not exist in XSL-F
Le Lundi, 23 juin 2003, à 12:08 Europe/Zurich, J.U. Anderegg a écrit :
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
...In jfor we defined an extension to XSL-FO (the "jfor-style"
attribute)
to control RTF styles
(1) This is not a FOP extension, but rather a fundamental change of the
XSL-FO language, which does
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> ...
> > How do you plan to handle RTF styles?
>
> In jfor we defined an extension to XSL-FO (the "jfor-style" attribute)
> to control RTF styles.
>
> I think some form of extension is needed as (AFAIK) the concept of
> styles does not exist in XSL-FO, as it is meant f
Le Lundi, 23 juin 2003, à 10:35 Europe/Zurich, J.U. Anderegg a écrit :
...
How do you plan to handle RTF styles?
In jfor we defined an extension to XSL-FO (the "jfor-style" attribute)
to control RTF styles.
Another way would be to recognize sets of attribute values in the input
XSL-FO and map th
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote
> The whole point of the StructureHandler interface is to be able to
> reuse FOP's "frontend" for structure-based renderers.
> The impact of StructureHandler on the "standard" FOP output formats
> (PDF mostly) is minor, but it allows the FOP "pipeline" to branch
> cle
