Re: Long licence

2003-02-25 Thread J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Check: Is every FOP committer (especially the Europe-based ones) on the party list??? I hope so. :-) No. But I'm in London for the XML/WebServices in two weeks. A few Cocooners have already signed on. Anybody else there? J.Pietschmann

Re: Long licence

2003-02-25 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 25.02.2003 18:11:29 Christian Geisert wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > Maintenance branch is changed to full licence. I feel dizzy now. :-) > > A big thank you for doing this! > (If I make it to Hannover I'll pay you a beer ;-) Can we make that a Coke? Would be great to see you there. I wa

Re: Long licence

2003-02-25 Thread Christian Geisert
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Maintenance branch is changed to full licence. I feel dizzy now. :-) A big thank you for doing this! (If I make it to Hannover I'll pay you a beer ;-) Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fo

Re: Long licence

2003-02-25 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Maintenance branch is changed to full licence. I feel dizzy now. :-) On 20.02.2003 07:46:25 Jeremias Maerki wrote: > That's it. The board has finally spoken. We need to change to long > licences in our codebase. Anyone out there with free time? If not, I can > do it. Jeremias Maerki --

RE: Long licence

2003-02-22 Thread Arved Sandstrom
> -Original Message- > From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: February 21, 2003 1:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Long licence > > On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Arved Sandstrom wrote: > > > I'd like to find out what lawyer thou

RE: Long licence

2003-02-21 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Arved Sandstrom wrote: > I'd like to find out what lawyer thought a long license is needed with every > file. Because I question that finding. Question the board@ (again) for a black/white answer - or work with licensing@ for a more interactive reply. But Bear in mind that

RE: Long licence

2003-02-21 Thread Arved Sandstrom
ASF members list. I have problems with this decision. Arved > -Original Message- > From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: February 21, 2003 9:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Long licence > > > Arved, > > I don't see

Re: Long licence

2003-02-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Arved, I don't see what's bad about it. The licence stays in every file as necessary, the IDE should just as a service to the developer hide the licence because it's not relevant to normal development tasks. On 21.02.2003 14:01:34 Arved Sandstrom wrote: > I find it odd that it's OK to suggest too

RE: Long licence

2003-02-21 Thread Arved Sandstrom
o find out what lawyer thought a long license is needed with every file. Because I question that finding. Arved > -Original Message- > From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: February 21, 2003 8:43 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Long licenc

Re: Long licence

2003-02-21 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > software developers. :-) It would be so cool, if IDEs would have the > ability to hide a licence at the beginning of a file. I;ve seen some clever pragma's/markers which let emacs do this. DW --

Re: Long licence

2003-02-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I know. Everyone here at Apache feels the same but AFAIK this is not possible. In today's world lawyers still seem to be more important than software developers. :-) It would be so cool, if IDEs would have the ability to hide a licence at the beginning of a file. Anyway, I can't give you a def

Re: Long licence

2003-02-20 Thread Peter B. West
Jeremias, Can we put the copyright notice at the end of the files? It's a PITA haaving it at the beginning. I'll change the FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design files. Peter Jeremias Maerki wrote: Thanks, your help is most welcome. Yes, we have to change all three :-) codebases. On 20.02.2003 08:33:31 Oleg

Re: Long licence

2003-02-20 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Thanks, your help is most welcome. Yes, we have to change all three :-) codebases. On 20.02.2003 08:33:31 Oleg Tkachenko wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > That's it. The board has finally spoken. We need to change to long > > licences in our codebase. Anyone out there with free time? If not, I c

Re: Long licence

2003-02-19 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Jeremias Maerki wrote: That's it. The board has finally spoken. We need to change to long licences in our codebase. Anyone out there with free time? If not, I can do it. I can help you. Should we change both codebases? -- Oleg Tkachenko Multiconn Technologies, Israel --

Long licence

2003-02-19 Thread Jeremias Maerki
That's it. The board has finally spoken. We need to change to long licences in our codebase. Anyone out there with free time? If not, I can do it. Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comman