So in conclusion I think there is a general consensus (vote) to move to
java 1.2.
I will commit what I have so far for the next release.
For java 1.1 users:
Sorry but I think it is better to do it this way. To run with java 1.1 you
could use the collections.jar and change the import statements.
. syyskuuta 2001 11:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Performance and java 1.1
Hi All,
I have been doing some performance testing so we can get an idea of how
things might be improving (or getting worse) with changes to the code.
There are three types of tests. I have used 6 fo documents
Hi All,
I have been doing some performance testing so we can get an idea of how
things might be improving (or getting worse) with changes to the code.
There are three types of tests. I have used 6 fo documents that are
generated 500 times.
- for each document a new jvm is started, so 3000
So the question is: can we drop java 1.1 support and use better data
structures?
+1 for this:
-even switching to a 1.2 JVM (+hotspot) without code changes often brings big
performance improvements compared to 1.1, so IMHO forcing users to 1.2 is a
good thing for FOP in general
-the
, 2001 3:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Performance and java 1.1
Hi All,
I have been doing some performance testing so we can get an idea of how
things might be improving (or getting worse) with changes to the code.
There are three types of tests. I have used 6 fo documents that are
generated
Keiron Liddle wrote:
[..]
So the question is: can we drop java 1.1 support and use better data
structures?
--- Christian Geisert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 (I think we should make this an official vote)
I think that FOP is not really usable in Applets which is the only sensible
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Performance and java 1.1
Keiron Liddle wrote:
[..]
So the question is: can we drop java 1.1 support and use better data
structures?
--- Christian Geisert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 (I think we should make this an official vote)
I think that FOP is not really
Alex McLintock wrote:
[..]
PS What are the rules for an official vote. I have been told off before
for voicing my opinion about a vote in another Apache project. Basically
I was told I couldn't vote because I hadn't contributed any source.
Shockingly enough this is true for FOP too.
see
Keiron Liddle wrote:
Hi All,
I have been doing some performance testing so we can get an idea of how
things might be improving (or getting worse) with changes to the code.
[snip]
So the question is: can we drop java 1.1 support and use better data
structures?
Interesting results!
With
- what a joke)
-Original Message-
From: Karen Lease [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 5:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Performance and java 1.1
Keiron Liddle wrote:
Hi All,
I have been doing some performance testing so we can get an idea of how
Keiron Liddle wrote:
Hi All,
.
Some recent changes have improved the times by about 1 - 2% but one
change
that I have tried has made about a 60% improvement with the threaded
test.
This is by simply using HashMap instead of Hashtable. This is very
significant for cocoon and
11 matches
Mail list logo
