Glen Mazza wrote:
--- "Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And now for a little digression on code generation.
My own view of code
generation by XSLT transformation can be summed up
as:
Why, Peter, you're in disagreement with everyone else
on this issue! (So what else is new? ;)
Everyo
--- "Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And now for a little digression on code generation.
> My own view of code
> generation by XSLT transformation can be summed up
> as:
>
Why, Peter, you're in disagreement with everyone else
on this issue! (So what else is new? ;)
> * the cano
John Austin wrote:
After my last post I went away to play in the code for a while.
Mostly to see what is necessary to isolate a minmal set of
classes related to Property handling.
What I found is:
1) Property is ubiquitous: every client class knows what package
it lives in. As a planning point
After my last post I went away to play in the code for a while.
Mostly to see what is necessary to isolate a minmal set of
classes related to Property handling.
What I found is:
1) Property is ubiquitous: every client class knows what package
it lives in. As a planning point, I better think a
