W. Eliot Kimber wrote:
I feel a need to say something about my frustration with FOP, because I
think it's a potential issue for the XSL FO world in general and it
concerns me, especially as a person who's working very hard to try to
advance the acceptance and use of FO, both through educating
Oleg,
As afaik xsl-fo schematron schema doesn't exist yet (XEP3 uses
schematron-like xsl for validation) I'm trying to develop such one.
If you feel that XEP's validation stylesheet may help - at least
as a source of inspiration to write your Schematron schema -
please feel free to use it.
Nikolai Grigoriev wrote:
If you feel that XEP's validation stylesheet may help - at least
as a source of inspiration to write your Schematron schema -
please feel free to use it. The stylesheet is com/renderx/xep/folint.xsl
inside XEP's Jar file. We plan to make it a public resource, as soon
as
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 18:55, Victor Mote wrote:
Fair enough. I submitted and Keiron committed to the CVS repository this
past week a document that attempts to do a better job of this. It combines
the implemented and limitations pages with a complete list of the
objects and properties in the
W. Eliot Kimber wrote:
My frustration stems from the fact that FOP, as good as it is, is simply
not ready for general use--it implements too few features of FO and has
too many implementation bugs to be considered a candidate for any sort
of production use except in the most constrained use
