We now have over 200 layout engine test cases in the repository which is
great. However, with this ever growing number I wonder if we should put
some more structure to it. There is a real chance that we get more and
more duplication just because people wouldn't know which tests are
doing what
I've already seen it and intend to fix it this morning (CEST). Thanks
for the hint nonetheless.
On 01.09.2005 03:18:33 Manuel Mall wrote:
We may have a case of the lost update problem here. My percentage
resolution patch which Finn kindly applied provided a testcase
external-graphic4.xml
Thanks. I'm convinced now that I should rewrite PDFNumber.doubleOut().
On 01.09.2005 01:36:12 Thomas DeWeese wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Thanks for the hint. Sounds like rewriting PDFNumber.doubleOut using
DecimalFormat makes sense. May I ask what you used before switching to
On 01.09.2005 06:04:45 Manuel Mall wrote:
We now have over 200 layout engine test cases in the repository which is
great.
Wow! I just hope nobody holds a grudge against me for introducing that
facility and pushing people to use it. ;-)
However, with this ever growing number I wonder if we
That's certainly a good idea.
On 01.09.2005 08:49:02 Manuel Mall wrote:
snip/
OK, what about me making up a big rename script like:
svn move padding1.xml character-padding-relative.xml
svn move padding2.xml basic-link-padding.xml
and a committer can apply that?
Jeremias Maerki
Note to self: If doing a change that involves a dependency, always run
the command-line build prior to a commit if you have the latest trunk
set up in the IDE.
Sorry, guys. I've reverted the change and I'm going to investigate
further what to do about the problem. AbstractDocument.setDocumentURI
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36455.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-537
Jeremias Maerki
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-537
Uh, no need to bother infrastructure. As I have some admin rights for
bugzilla I'll have a look at it later today.
(Just tried to assign this issue to myself but it seems I don't have
permission)
--
Christian
D'oh. Didn't know that. Thanks for handing that.
On 01.09.2005 11:41:02 Christian Geisert wrote:
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-537
Uh, no need to bother infrastructure. As I have some admin rights for
bugzilla I'll have a look at it later today.
(Just
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36455.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36460.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36460.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36460.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36455.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36460.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36460.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Richard, is there a problem left to be looked at? I'm not sure from
reading your posts.
On 31.08.2005 15:43:21 richardw wrote:
Jeremias Maerki writes:
Weird. This test case works for me and it is not disabled (see
disabled-testcases.txt).
What does the Area Tree XML look like (found
No surprise, actually. The tables all use the collapsing border model.
But tell me, have they updated the NIST test suite for XSL Rec 1.0? I
remember that at a stand-still in working-draft stage (master-name
instead of master-reference).
On 01.09.2005 14:45:30 Finn Bock wrote:
Hi
Running the
[Jeremias]
No surprise, actually. The tables all use the collapsing border model.
But tell me, have they updated the NIST test suite for XSL Rec 1.0? I
remember that at a stand-still in working-draft stage (master-name
instead of master-reference).
Years back, when we last talked about the
I think the area tree viewport generated by the current version for an e-g
with padding and borders is wrong.
Here is the fo snippet (from external-graphic_border_padding.xml):
fo:external-graphic
src=../../resources/images/bgimg300dpi.jpg
border=solid 5pt padding=5pt
This is definitely wrong, you're right. I know how that got through the
tests: The checks are insufficient. The stuff that is checked is
definitely ok. But bpd/ipd are not checked. That's the problem.
On 01.09.2005 15:53:46 Manuel Mall wrote:
I think the area tree viewport generated by the
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005 10:13 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
This is definitely wrong, you're right. I know how that got through
the tests: The checks are insufficient. The stuff that is checked is
definitely ok. But bpd/ipd are not checked. That's the problem.
Thanks - I'll fix the problem and the
Jeremias Maerki writes:
Richard, is there a problem left to be looked at? I'm not sure from
reading your posts.
Yes. The external svg handling is broken. I'll get some new
testcases together at some point to demonstrate the effect. In
the meantime just get two or three large svg images and
On 01.09.2005 16:46:17 Christian Geisert wrote:
Christian Geisert schrieb:
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-537
Uh, no need to bother infrastructure. As I have some admin rights for
bugzilla I'll have a look at it later today.
Ok, I've added 1.6
Indeed, the normal allocation rectangle of an inline area is different
than the one of a block area. See 4.3.2. Geometric Definitions in the
1.0 spec.
Border and padding for an inline area seem to be outside the allocation
rectangle in before and after directions. Interesting.
On 01.09.2005
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
On 01.09.2005 16:46:17 Christian Geisert wrote:
[..]
As we already have a 'pdf renderer' and 'awt renderer' component, is the
new 'renderers' component meant for 'General Renderer issues'?
Should we also add 'ps renderer', 'pcl renderer' and 'rtf' components?
I
I'm not sure here. The fo:external-graphic uses the large-allocation-rectangle
(§ 6.6.5), that comprises padding and border. This makes me say that in Manuel's
example the fo:block's bpd should be calculated with the second formula. The
fo:block's content forms a line whose
You got me thinking about extensions, Finn. I've written down my
thoughts in the Wiki [1]. I don't have time to implement the full extent
of my ideas right now, but I think I'll try to implement the PS
extensions in the way I outlined them on that page. If anyone wants more
information I can add
Oh right. Again someone caught me shooting too fast from the hip. Damn.
I will probably never manage to get that right. :-( It's good to have
people around to pay attention.
I wondered about the large-allocation-rectangle while reading through
6.3.2 but obviously forgot to check the docs for e-g
I haven't found anything odd, yet. Looking forward to your test cases.
On 01.09.2005 16:21:43 richardw wrote:
Jeremias Maerki writes:
Richard, is there a problem left to be looked at? I'm not sure from
reading your posts.
Yes. The external svg handling is broken. I'll get some new
Vincent, Jeremias,
thanks for the clarification.
After looking just a little bit more into it it appears the current fop
version is dealing pretty badly with inline borders and padding. There
seem to be no testcases for it either.
I'll attach 2 files.
A simple test case.
The pdf output
32 matches
Mail list logo
