On Sep 9, 2005, at 01:55, J.Pietschmann wrote:
while examining the Checkstyle and JavaDoc complaints I
got a few more questions about the FOP style:
+1 from me on all three points.
Cheers,
Andreas
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:38:18AM +0800, Manuel Mall wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 07:55 am, J.Pietschmann wrote:
> > Hi devs,
> > while examining the Checkstyle and JavaDoc complaints I
> > got a few more questions about the FOP style:
> > 1. There is still quite a bit of hungarian notation here an
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:48:11PM +0200, J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Next question: I used to have old (maintenance branch) jars
> for FOP and Batik in the repository, which causes compilation
> problems. Therefore it might be a good idea to include only
> specific fles rather than *.jar in the classpa
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 08:33:52AM -0600, Victor Mote wrote:
> Simon Pepping wrote:
>
> > I find this certainly interesting. IN principle, it would
> > allow client programs, say an editor, to construct its own
> > implementation of the FOTree interface.
>
> Thanks for your interest. I had to t
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:04:08PM +0200, Luca Furini wrote:
> Luca Furini wrote:
>
> For example, if we have this LM tree
>
>Outer BlockLM
> |
> +++
> |||
> BlockLM 1BlockLM 2BlockLM 3
>
Andreas,
You are asking a lot of questions. To most I have no answer, but I
have one reservation.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 01:41:05AM +0200, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> The other ones I encountered so far: implicit columns (from cells in
> first row), column-number and number-columns-repeated.
>
I apologize for not responding sooner, but I've been very busy lately.
Anyways, I've finally found some time to get working on the website. I
think I got everything right, now I just need to work on some broken links.
Also, I am wondering if the svn diff will show everything (I moved some
fil
