Properties - was Sponsorship

Peter B. West wrote: Finn Bock wrote: [Peter B. West] The alt-design property code was, back then, in my eyes, code written by a person who did not intuitively create object oriented design. ... It was, IMO, not a good fundation for further work. Fair enough, apart from the deferred

Welcome Manuel!

Finally, after more than 4 weeks Manuel got his account. So, welcome, Manuel, to the FOP subproject! Most of what you need to know you can find under http://www.apache.org/dev/. The most important resource right now will be the guide for new committers: http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-gui

Properties - was Sponsorship

Peter B. West wrote: Finn Bock wrote: [Peter B. West] The alt-design property code was, back then, in my eyes, code written by a person who did not intuitively create object oriented design. ... It was, IMO, not a good fundation for further work. Fair enough, apart from the deferred

Re: Sponsorship

The Web Maestro wrote: Sorry to hear that you were stewing about this. I suspect it feels better now that it's out in the open (although I'm not convinced this is the best place for it--it might be, I'm just not convinced...). I don't have a lot of emotion about this either way (although I

Re: script property

On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 03:30 am, J.Pietschmann wrote: > Manuel Mall wrote: > > What we also need for proper script support is a mapping from > > Unicode code point to script. > > On a second thought: isn't this what Class Character.UnicodeBlock > does? > Joerg, Thank you - I didn't even know that this

Re: white-space collapse across fo:inlines

Manuel Mall wrote: Not sure if this is another of those areas in the spec which is cause for much confusion but I noticed that FOP trunk collapses white space across fo:inlines. This isn't the correct behavior, as well as collapsing across a changed text decoration. Unfortunately, this isn't e

Re: script property

Manuel Mall wrote: What we also need for proper script support is a mapping from Unicode code point to script. On a second thought: isn't this what Class Character.UnicodeBlock does? J.Pietschmann

Re: Sponsorship

On Oct 6, 2005, at 1:30 AM, Peter B. West wrote: I've been stewing on this for quite a while, and as you, at least, seem to have missed the point, I'll vent. Sorry to hear that you were stewing about this. I suspect it feels better now that it's out in the open (although I'm not convinced th

Re: Sponsorship

Finn Bock wrote: [Peter B. West] ... That code was alt-design properties code. It seems to me that many of the ideas and implementation details of alt-design are now sitting in the FOP code base. This is true whether Finn ever looked at the alt-design properties code. It ain't over yet.[1

Re: svn commit: r306656 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr: BreakingAlgorithm.java PageBreakingAlgorithm.java

Great! Thanks, Luca, it works fine. On 06.10.2005 17:07:01 Luca Furini wrote: > > Fixing a bug reported by Jeremias affecting the handling of glue and > > penalty elements after a break when the algorithm restarts. > > Now it should be ok. A nasty little bug, anyway ... > > Unfortunately, I had

Re: svn commit: r306656 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr: BreakingAlgorithm.java PageBreakingAlgorithm.java

Fixing a bug reported by Jeremias affecting the handling of glue and penalty elements after a break when the algorithm restarts. Now it should be ok. A nasty little bug, anyway ... Unfortunately, I had to duplicate a few lines (a for loop looking for glue elements after a feasible break): the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36952] New: - FopServlet.java in servlet examples

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Sponsorship

[Peter B. West] ... That code was alt-design properties code. It seems to me that many of the ideas and implementation details of alt-design are now sitting in the FOP code base. This is true whether Finn ever looked at the alt-design properties code. It ain't over yet.[1] I did, before

Re: Knuth algorithm problem

Thank you so much for looking into it. From the sound of it I would have continued my search for a long time. On 06.10.2005 11:42:19 Luca Furini wrote: > Luca Furini wrote: > > > I'm going to see what happens ... > > I've found the bug! > > The width, stretch and shrink of the suppressed elemen

Re: Knuth algorithm problem

Luca Furini wrote: I'm going to see what happens ... I've found the bug! The width, stretch and shrink of the suppressed elements after a break is taken into account in BreakingAlgorithm.addBreaks(), but this method is called only if everythings goes well; in your test there is a restart (a

Re: white-space collapse across fo:inlines

On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 05:14 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > That helps a lot. Thanks for looking it up! Yes, Karen was a > "Fopper", and a good one. Now, the only thing left is to fix the bug. > :-) > Its a bug in the "inline" part of FOP so its probably me or Luca in the moment. > Jeremias Maerki Ma

Re: white-space collapse across fo:inlines

That helps a lot. Thanks for looking it up! Yes, Karen was a "Fopper", and a good one. Now, the only thing left is to fix the bug. :-) On 06.10.2005 10:23:49 Manuel Mall wrote: > On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 03:44 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > What I write next should be consumed with caution and the fact

Re: Sponsorship

> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 08:27:45AM +0100, Peter B. West wrote: > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > >On 29.09.2005 11:58:57 Peter B. West wrote: > > > > > I can understand that some sponsors may be sensitive to divulging such > > information, for at least two reasons. Firstly, the treat of being > > i

Re: white-space collapse across fo:inlines

On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 03:44 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > What I write next should be consumed with caution and the fact in > mind that English is a foreign language to me, because I have big > trouble translating 4.2.4. 4.2.4 defines "preceding" WRT to the area > tree, but I really can't parse that se

Re: Knuth algorithm problem

Jeremias Maerki wrote: I think I've just stumbled over a problem in the Knuth algorithm. I'm going to see what happens ... Regards Luca

Re: white-space collapse across fo:inlines

What I write next should be consumed with caution and the fact in mind that English is a foreign language to me, because I have big trouble translating 4.2.4. 4.2.4 defines "preceding" WRT to the area tree, but I really can't parse that section. OTOH, 7.15.12 talks about flow objects, not areas, ev