Bug report for Fop [2006/01/29]

2006-01-29 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38282] - [patch] from-table-column implementation

2006-01-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38434] New: - Fop Trunk does not compile with Java 1.3

2006-01-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38433] New: - Embedded Xalan produce different result

2006-01-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

AW: svn commit: r372916 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/render/rtf/RTFHandler.java

2006-01-29 Thread Peter Herweg
> Right now, it works, and it enhances our RTF output, so there's no > need to revert, but I'm wondering if there isn't an alternative > solution that would look/feel better. Yes, but it does not work very good. There is no exception anymore, but column width are not calculated correctly. I wo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37725] - NullPointerException in -rtf only (not pdf, txt, png..)

2006-01-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r372916 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/render/rtf/RTFHandler.java

2006-01-29 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Yes, it makes sense and I agree with you, too. We should try to find a way to share the handling of relative values for both types of handlers. On 27.01.2006 20:21:10 Simon Pepping wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 06:56:21PM +0100, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > > On Jan 27, 2006, at 18:28, Andreas L