Just committed the initial support for the soft hyphen.
As we had two in favour of having the SHY always produce a break
opportunity and only one against that's the route I took.
I had no luck with giving the SHY a reduced penalty and have the Knuth
algorithm favour them before normal hyphenati
Jeremias Maerki a écrit :
> On 12.01.2007 09:25:59 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> Jeremias Maerki a écrit :
>>> Good to see that happen! Here's my take:
>>>
>>> On 11.01.2007 13:24:16 Manuel Mall wrote:
Hi,
when I implemented the UAX#14 line breaking I noticed that fop doesn't
cur
On Saturday 13 January 2007 19:57, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki a écrit :
> > On 12.01.2007 09:25:59 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> >> Jeremias Maerki a écrit :
> >>> Good to see that happen! Here's my take:
> >>>
> >>> On 11.01.2007 13:24:16 Manuel Mall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Still
On Jan 12, 2007, at 13:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a quick comment on this, given the above stats you might
consider having a single Object field and switch the type of object
from the actual child (when there is a single child) to a List of
children when there are multiple children:
After having delved into the UAX#14 and SHY issues I am interested in
compiling a FOP UNICODE issues list. That is a list of things that
still require work to make FOP Unicode compliant. Obviously the best
place for such a list is the wiki. But before doing this I am
interested in some even mor
On Jan 9, 2007, at 15:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: vhennebert
Date: Tue Jan 9 06:21:59 2007
New Revision: 494416
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=494416
Log:
In relaxed validation mode, it should be acceptable to have
fo:table-footer /after/ fo:table-body
Just a littl
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 08:27:20PM +0900, Manuel Mall wrote:
> On Saturday 13 January 2007 19:57, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> > Well, again, the description of the "hyphenate" property (§7.9.4)
> > sounds clear to me: when false, "Hyphenation may not be used in the
> > line-breaking algorithm".
> >
On Jan 13, 2007, at 10:31, Manuel Mall wrote:
Hi Manuel,
Just committed the initial support for the soft hyphen.
Nice job, thanks!
As we had two in favour of having the SHY always produce a break
opportunity and only one against that's the route I took.
I had no luck with giving the SHY a
