DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42861] - Font detection only works for first document.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42861] - Font detection only works for first document.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Severe : Exception. Cannot Load Font. No font URI's available.

On Jul 12, 2007, at 21:00, Loran Kary wrote: I would imagine that support for additional fonts beyond the Base14 would be pretty fundamental to PDF formatting and therefore if it isn't fully implemented there must be a pretty good reason. What I do seem to remember is that, when you use emb

Re: Severe : Exception. Cannot Load Font. No font URI's available.

Thanks Andreas, I got a brief and vague response on the users group that left me wanting more information. Whether or not I could contribute to a potential solution, and that is a possibility, would depend on whether the work involved would be major or minor. So I am trying to get some

Re: Severe : Exception. Cannot Load Font. No font URI's available.

On Jul 12, 2007, at 20:12, Loran Kary wrote: Hi Perhaps I am posting this question on the wrong list or perhaps my question has been asked and answered before. The latter, in a way... You asked the same question on fop-users a couple of days ago, where the response was that FOP currently d

Re: Severe : Exception. Cannot Load Font. No font URI's available.

Perhaps I am posting this question on the wrong list or perhaps my question has been asked and answered before. But to state my question again, why is it not sufficient to supply FOP with a font metrics file and the font triplets in the configuration file? Why does it seem that FOP needs t

Re: svn commit: r555680 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/inline/LineLayoutManager.java

On Jul 12, 2007, at 18:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all New Revision: 555680 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=555680 Log: TODO removed: use LayoutContext's stackLimit instead of the availIPD parameter Maybe one of the layout-experts should have a look at this to see if I

Re: junit-layout-standard test broken

I thought for a moment it was my font detection patch until I sanity checked myself and built a fresh trunk :-) Adrian. Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Jul 12, 2007, at 15:49, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Adrian Cumiskey a écrit : The junit-layout-standard target seems to broken on trunk... My b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42868] - font-weight on custom fonts

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: junit-layout-standard test broken

On Jul 12, 2007, at 15:49, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Adrian Cumiskey a écrit : The junit-layout-standard target seems to broken on trunk... My bad, sorry. I didn't think of table cells with content of zero length, which was the root of the problem... I've committed a temporary hack as I'm i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42861] - Font detection only works for first document.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: junit-layout-standard test broken

Adrian Cumiskey a écrit : > The junit-layout-standard target seems to broken on trunk... My bad, sorry. I didn't think of table cells with content of zero length, which was the root of the problem... I've committed a temporary hack as I'm in the process of heavily changing this part of the code. L

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42861] - Font detection only works for first document.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

junit-layout-standard test broken

The junit-layout-standard target seems to broken on trunk... [junit] Testcase: markers_4.xml(org.apache.fop.layoutengine.LayoutEngineTestSuite$1): Caused an ERROR [junit] Expected XPath expression to evaluate to '0', but got '' (XPath: //regionBefore/block[2]/lineArea/text) [junit

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42868] - font-weight on custom fonts

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42868] New: - font-weight on custom fonts

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu