Re: Help Refactoring the Website

On 7/31/07, Vincent Hennebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Clay, > > Thanks for chiming in! I've committed my changes, so the site should be re-factored. There is likely a bunch of content in the '0.94' realm that needs updating so it's more relevant to the current release. In addition, there m

AFP Output Resolution

Hi, Currently the AFPRenderer is fixed to use a calculation against a static final DPI_CONVERSION_FACTOR_240 to produce 240 dpi output. I've looked at the code, and it looks fairly straight forward to introduce an extra configuration setting which would allow the user to modify this calculat

Re: Drop RTF Support?

Mark C. Allman schrieb: What I do now is the following: doc.xml --|doc.pdf |--> XSLT ENGINE --> doc.fo --> FOP --> { doc.rtf } translator_doc.xsl --| . Putting somet

Re: Drop RTF Support?

I only meant that if we replace the RTF capability with something equivalent. I use the RTF generation so that I can then convert a few things to MS Word (can't ignore the 800 pound gorilla in the room). I think "ODF" was in the post I replied to, so I just used that as an example. What I do now

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42956] - [PATCH] AFP Renderer - No Operation Extension

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Drop RTF Support?

Hi Mark, Mark C. Allman a écrit : > Drop RTF with nothing to replace it, e.g., ODF? I'd rather not. > > Swap out RTF with, say, ODF? Sounds great to me. > > I'd even volunteer some time to help with development. I seem to > remember something about Java ;-] Thanks for your offer to help!

Re: Drop RTF Support?

Hi, Jeremias Maerki a écrit : > Such a move would have to be well-documented because some people could > (or probably will anyway) be upset when they upgrade and RTF just stops > working until they add fop-sandbox.jar. I'm sure there are a lot of > people perfectly happy with what the RTF handler

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42956] - [PATCH] AFP Renderer - No Operation Extension

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: More about the effects of the PropertyCache

On Wednesday 01 August 2007 15:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Andreas L Delmelle writes: > > I've been playing with trying to make the cache thread-local > > If in doubt, you could always make the caching multi-level. > L1 is the current global cache. L2 is a thread-local equivalent > of the sam

Re: More about the effects of the PropertyCache

Andreas L Delmelle writes: > Been reading up a bit on concurrency and synchronization and the > likes, and I'm in the meantime quite convinced that the strategy > should indeed be altered to move away from static final Maps. Don't > know if Richard is still listening in and has any opinio