Hi All,
Does anybody know why FOP Trunk completely screws up the rendering of
the attached file? It works fine when removing the fo:inline element, so
I guess this has something to do with that element. FOP 0.95 renders the
file correctly, both with and without the fo:inline.
Thanks,
Vincent
ht
On 17 Nov 2008, at 07:59, AshuSuri wrote:
Hi
Sorry, I posted a reply on fop-users@ (since fop-dev@ is not the
appropriate place for questions like these), but forgot to CC you and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FOP 0.95 to generate PDF and my input is xhtml file.FOP
uses xalan
to create
On 17 Nov 2008, at 12:36, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Vincent
Does anybody know why FOP Trunk completely screws up the rendering of
the attached file? It works fine when removing the fo:inline
element, so
I guess this has something to do with that element. FOP 0.95 renders
the
file correct
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46211
Andreas L. Delmelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 06:39:58PM +0100, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2008, at 12:36, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>
> Hi Vincent
>
>> Does anybody know why FOP Trunk completely screws up the rendering of
>> the attached file? It works fine when removing the fo:inline element,
>> so
>> I guess
On 17 Nov 2008, at 20:40, Simon Pepping wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 06:39:58PM +0100, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On 17 Nov 2008, at 12:36, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Does anybody know why FOP Trunk completely screws up the rendering
of
the attached file? It works fine when removing the fo:inli
