https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725
--- Comment #3 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2011-02-07
14:02:52 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> At the time I did this, there were no generics yet. I have long been aware
> that this violates type safety, but I do not know a solution.
>
I'd like to second Simon's comments, very unselfish and good work Andreas.
Adrian.
On 7 February 2011 16:26, Simon Pepping wrote:
> I am pleased that you undertake this kind of cleanup work in the
> layout engine. It is very useful that you try to make this piece of
> code more accessible.
>
>
I am pleased that you undertake this kind of cleanup work in the
layout engine. It is very useful that you try to make this piece of
code more accessible.
Simon
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 12:18:15AM +0100, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> On 05 Feb 2011, at 22:49, adelme...@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Author:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725
--- Comment #2 from Simon Pepping 2011-02-07 03:22:51 EST
---
I know. I created that to be able to work with block-level content in
inline-level content. An inline LM may have block-level LMs in its subtree. I
solved the problem by letting
