DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51413] New: tag support to make section of rtf document readonly

2011-06-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51413 Bug #: 51413 Summary: tag support to make section of rtf document readonly Product: Fop Version: 1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Sever

Testing Complex Scripts

2011-06-22 Thread Simon Pepping
I tested the latest code in the branch ComplexScripts with a font called Lohit-Devanagari, version 2.4.5, copyright Red Hat, license GPLv2, file lohit_hi.ttf, Debian package ttf-devanagari-fonts. Fontforge shows that the font has 2 GPOS tables and a large number of GSUB tables. I was not successfu

Indic Script processing

2011-06-22 Thread Simon Pepping
Glenn, I studied the OpenType spec. With that knowledge I assumed, perhaps naively, that for all OT fonts a correct rendering can be obtained by following the directives in the tables in the font. The code of the ComplexScripts branch provides specific processing of each Indic font (until now Dev

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49687] [PATCH] Complex Script Support

2011-06-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687 --- Comment #38 from Simon Pepping 2011-06-22 18:31:13 UTC --- The code contains a number of Unicode properties, e.g. in util.CharUtilities and DevanagariScriptProcessor. It would be better if all Unicode properties would be collected in o

Re: Indic Script processing

2011-06-22 Thread Glenn Adams
That is correct. Due to the design of OTF, the font tables are insufficient. Each Indic script requires its own orthographic syllabization logic. Where there is common logic, it will be shared in the implementation. Arabic script has other script specific requirements outside of the font tables. F

Re: Testing Complex Scripts

2011-06-22 Thread Glenn Adams
Microsoft changed the Indic script processing logic around 2008, and newer fonts provide both old 'deva' (now deprecated) and new 'dev2' tables. Apparently the older font you accessed does not. I have not tested against older fonts that do not support the new 'dev2' semantics. I have listed the fo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49687] [PATCH] Complex Script Support

2011-06-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687 --- Comment #39 from Glenn Adams 2011-06-22 19:29:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #38) > The code contains a number of Unicode properties, e.g. in util.CharUtilities > and DevanagariScriptProcessor. It would be better if all Unicode proper