On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.comwrote:
From the surface I would have been very much in favor of supporting a
merge in the near future, however I have had the chance to review some
areas of the complex script branch and I have some concerns.
The
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 02:53:54PM +0100, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Here are the sizes of some new files:
1075 src/java/org/apache/fop/fonts/GlyphSequence.java
1089 src/java/org/apache/fop/fonts/GlyphProcessingState.java
1269
I am pleased to learn that you are also in need of this new
functionality.
I share some of Vincent and Peter's concerns about technical points of
the code. On the other hand, this is the only implementation of
complex scripts we have, created by Glenn, in the style of Glenn. It
is an initial
On 21/10/2011 09:36, Simon Pepping wrote:
Hi Simon,
I am pleased to learn that you are also in need of this new
functionality.
I share some of Vincent and Peter's concerns about technical points of
the code. On the other hand, this is the only implementation of
complex scripts we have,
Chris,
I would really like to see an acknowledgement from Glenn that there are
some imperfections that need addressing.
I wasn't aware I had given anyone the impression of presenting a perfect
submission. In fact, one of my favorite quotes is Voltaire's *le mieux est
l'ennemi du bien* the
Quick question about this.
Please forgive my naïveté but, does this code affect processing
if you're not using ComplexScript support?
Thanks,
Clay
On 21/10/11 09:36, Simon Pepping wrote:
I am pleased to learn that you are also in need of this new
functionality.
I share some of Vincent and Peter's concerns about technical points of
the code. On the other hand, this is the only implementation of
complex scripts we have, created by
On 21/10/2011 15:13, Glenn Adams wrote:
Chris,
Hi Glenn,
I would really like to see an acknowledgement from Glenn that there
are some imperfections that need addressing.
I wasn't aware I had given anyone the impression of presenting a
perfect submission. In fact, one of my favorite
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060
Willi willi.firul...@lycos.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
inline
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Chris Bowditch bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Since Thunderhead also needs this feature we are willing to invest some
time into it too. Currently my team are telling me it would take 9 person
months to port this code into our branch of FOP, partly
10 matches
Mail list logo
