Added myself. The Cocoon Serializer is a good idea, IF!!! Maven is kind
with me this time. ;-) We could also do a Bugzilla cleanup (long due).
Improving the docs and the FAQ is another idea.
On 21.09.2006 10:02:46 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi FOPpers,
As I think some of you are coming to the
On 9/22/06, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added myself. The Cocoon Serializer is a good idea, IF!!! Maven is kind
with me this time. ;-)...
I might get some flak from the Cocoon team for saying this, but I
think a FOP trunk serializer would be good for Cocoon 2.1.x as well
(the 2.1
Cocoon 2.1.x then. That sounds like a more productive approach. :-)
If they fire up their flak, I'll retaliate by ranting about Maven. Hehe.
On 22.09.2006 15:50:50 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 9/22/06, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added myself. The Cocoon Serializer is a good
On 9/22/06, Vincent Hennebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know about nothing of Cocoon, will that be a problem? :-/...
I'm sure Cocoonistas will be delighted to have you guys around.
-Bertrand
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:05:54PM +0200, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
I know about nothing of Cocoon, will that be a problem? :-/
Also, although this is perhaps a bit ambitious for two days, we could
discuss about the merging of the line- and page-level breaking
algorithms?
It is a good idea
On 22.09.2006 20:40:17 Simon Pepping wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:05:54PM +0200, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
I know about nothing of Cocoon, will that be a problem? :-/
Certainly not. But it might help you getting to know Cocoon since you're
likely going to do Cocoon projects in the future,
Hi FOPpers,
As I think some of you are coming to the Cocoon GetTogether: you're
welcome to sign up at http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/GT2006Hackaton.
I have added creating a Cocoon serializer for the current FOP
release as a hacking idea. Not sure if I'll have much time to work on
this myself,
