Hi,
> Author: vhennebert
> Date: Thu Jun 19 03:56:51 2008
> New Revision: 669448
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=669448&view=rev
> Log:
> A Java version of the prototype for interleaved page and line breaking
Since I’ll be away for the next 10 days, I thought I’d commit what
I have now
That is a rather ideal situation. It requires not only interleaving of
page and line breaking, but also of page breaking and collection of
Knuth elements. That requires some communication. The collection of
Knuth elements is deeply recursive, LM.getNextKnuthElements. Each LM
now needs to pass its K
On Oct 2, 2007, at 18:47, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Oct 2, 2007, at 12:27, Chris Bowditch wrote:
Hmm. I tend to agree with Simon's perspective here. The terms
"total-fit" and "best-fit" refer to the implementation of the
algorithms. Surely the end result of the total-fit algorithm is
On Oct 2, 2007, at 12:27, Chris Bowditch wrote:
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
Hi Andreas,
That is not DISagreeing with me, I think (almost on the contrary).
I did not mean total-fit in the sense of the implementation of
the algorithm, but total-fit as to the end-result: as such, a
total-
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
Hi Andreas,
That is not DISagreeing with me, I think (almost on the contrary). I
did not mean total-fit in the sense of the implementation of the
algorithm, but total-fit as to the end-result: as such, a total-fit
result may precisely require a breaking-up into
On Oct 1, 2007, at 21:50, Simon Pepping wrote:
[Me:]
I wouldn't think so. Total-fit for me precisely implies taking
into account
the fact that the available IPD may alter from one page to another.
What FOP Trunk currently does in that scenario is definitely not a
total-fit, or
at least,
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 06:40:41PM +0200, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> One thing I was wondering about: doLineBreaking() is parameterless for the
> moment. Do you see this changing in the future? i.e. If this method can be
> called multiple times on the same paragraph, give it a position to start
On Sep 30, 2007, at 22:03, Simon Pepping wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 08:59:36AM +0200, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
Either the code in ListItemLM and others needs to be adapted to
deal with
ListElements instead of KnuthElements, or the ParagraphListElement
needs to
subclass KnuthElement in
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 08:59:36AM +0200, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> As far as I can tell for the moment, the error is virtually always the same
> ClassCastException, since the related LMs expect a list of KnuthElements,
> where they currently get a list of ListElements.
> A KnuthElement is alwa
On Sep 25, 2007, at 09:01, Simon Pepping wrote:
Hi Simon
I've been browsing through the branch a bit, and
The code I submitted passes 222 out of 341 layout-standard
unit tests. Normal paragraphs are formatted properly. The errors are
in mainly in footnotes, list items, tables, and markers.
A
On Sep 25, 2007, at 17:18, Simon Pepping wrote:
Hi Simon
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:01:59AM +0200, Simon Pepping wrote:
The branch was copied from revision 519671, when I started this
work. Next I will work on merging the changes of trunk since then
into
the branch.
That was not as difficu
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:01:59AM +0200, Simon Pepping wrote:
> The branch was copied from revision 519671, when I started this
> work. Next I will work on merging the changes of trunk since then into
> the branch.
That was not as difficult as I feared, and it is done.
The only real problem was p
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:32:25AM +0200, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>
> I second that. I???ll try to follow your work but right now I have
> absolutely no time. I???ll be back on FOP from mid-October on, so
> hopefully I???ll be able to give some help (if needed).
Until now I have done this as a
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:19:47AM +0100, Chris Bowditch wrote:
> Simon Pepping wrote:
>
> In a word: WOW!
>
> And I thought you had stopped following the FOP project! How wrong was I!
In a sense that is true. During summer I followed FOP only
superficially and did not do any work on this branch.
Hi,
Chris Bowditch a écrit :
> Simon Pepping wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just created the branch Temp_Interleaved_Page_Line_Breaking and
>> committed code to it. The branch contains a file BRANCH, which states
>> the purpose of the bra
Simon Pepping wrote:
Hi,
I just created the branch Temp_Interleaved_Page_Line_Breaking and
committed code to it. The branch contains a file BRANCH, which states
the purpose of the branch as follows:
This is branch Temp_Interleaved_Page_Line_Breaking. It holds the
development of interleaved
Hi,
I just created the branch Temp_Interleaved_Page_Line_Breaking and
committed code to it. The branch contains a file BRANCH, which states
the purpose of the branch as follows:
This is branch Temp_Interleaved_Page_Line_Breaking. It holds the
development of interleaved page and line breaking
17 matches
Mail list logo
