I do not remember why I did that. Chris' argument is the most likely
reason. In the mentioned revision there is also a method that returns
FOTreeBuilder as a ContentHandler.
Simon
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 03:49:00PM +0100, Chris Bowditch wrote:
> Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >does anyone
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi,
does anyone know why the o.a.f.apps.Fop.getDefaultHandler method returns
an instance of org.xml.sax.helpers.DefaultHandler and not just an
org.xml.sax.ContentHandler? Could that be changed?
Hi Vincent,
Why would you want to change it? As Jeremias already said Defa
Hi Vincent
Why? Not sure. Couldn't reproduce that from the mailing list archives.
Changed? No, because it would break backwards-compatibility. What's the
motivation behind the question? Every DefaultHandler is a ContentHandler,
so this shouldn't be a problem.
Interesting case, BTW, if you go loo
Hi,
does anyone know why the o.a.f.apps.Fop.getDefaultHandler method returns
an instance of org.xml.sax.helpers.DefaultHandler and not just an
org.xml.sax.ContentHandler? Could that be changed?
Thanks,
Vincent
