IPD = inline-progression-dimension
FOP is probably peeved because you didn't tell it how big to make the
columns. FOP doesn't automatically determine the size of columns.
If you can't figure it out pretty quickly from that info, send a code
listing (short as possible but that sh
I get the following error:
[java] [ERROR] At least one of minimum, optimum, or maximum IPD must
be specified on table.
occuring a page that starts a long (but simple) table extending
over multiple pages.
Searching the source code for "maximum IPD" does not turn up anything and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
hi..
i got this error message everytime i run my fop
:
[WARNING] Sum of fixed column widths 793693 greater than maximum specified
IPD 0
This error is simply saying that youve declared columns whose total width is
greater than the width of the page.
Column widths need
...
hi..
i got this error message everytime i run my fop
:
[WARNING] Sum of fixed column widths 793693 greater than maximum specified
IPD 0
[ERROR] At least one of minimum, optimum, or maximum IPD must be specified
on table.
[ERROR] At least one of minimum, optimum, or maximum IPD must be
Abhijit Junnare wrote:
When I run FOP i get the following error.
[ERROR] At least one of minimum, optimum, or maximum
IPD must be specified on table.
I know thats its the problem with specifying IPD for
the table in the stylesheet. But I dont really
understand what I am missing and where should
When I run FOP i get the following error.
[ERROR] At least one of minimum, optimum, or maximum
IPD must be specified on table.
I know thats its the problem with specifying IPD for
the table in the stylesheet. But I dont really
understand what I am missing and where should I
specify Inline
TED]Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m> cc: (cco: Marcelo Jaccoud
Amaral/RJ/Petrobras)
Assunto: Re: IPD
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> One has to partially forgive our American friends
> for such offenses --
> after a century, they still don't use the metric
> system, you cannot ask
> them to respect the prefixes.
>
Ich bin mit Ihnen gar nicht einverstanden! The
prefixes milli, centi, kilo, etc
Marcelo Jaccoud Amaral wrote:
> By the way, "point" is a terrible measurement unit, because in typography
> there are three kinds of points:
> - the Anglo-Saxon point = 1/12 pica = 0,013835 in = 0,3514 mm (no,
> it's not exactly 1/72 in !!)
> - the Didot point = 0,3759 mm
> - the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: (cco: Marcelo Jaccoud
Amaral/RJ/Petrobras)
e> Assunto: Re: IPD
Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
What's the problem? I doubt that ISO owns a patent on those prefixes :-)
It depends. ISO declared it illegal. In many countries this is
backed by law, in the sense if you use an inappropriate combination
and someone takes damage or even only feels confused because of
this,
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 21:48, J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Should be "1/1000 pt", not millipoint, unless you want to attract
> the wrath of the ISO community for using ISO prefixes with non-ISO
> measurement units...
What's the problem? I doubt that ISO owns a patent on those prefixes :-)
Bye,
Chris Bowditch wrote:
I think the unit of IPD is millipoints, but I am not 100% certain,
Should be "1/1000 pt", not millipoint, unless you want to attract
the wrath of the ISO community for using ISO prefixes with non-ISO
measurement units...
J.P
I have been going through and trying to clean up warnings in my log files.
I was getting numerous (for example):
1062605170037 -> WARN [fop]:Sum of fixed column widths 685974 greater
than maximum specified IPD 23464
I saw the posting by J.Pietschmann about making sure you define a width
Chris Bowditch wrote:
> >Now my question:
> >What is the exact conversion between IPD and pt or px and so on?
> >The value ipd says nothing for me.
>
> IPD stands for Inline Progression Dimension. In some cases this
> equates to
> width, but this is not
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now my question:
What is the exact conversion between IPD and pt or px and so on?
The value ipd says nothing for me.
IPD stands for Inline Progression Dimension. In some cases this equates to
width, but this is not true in general, if reference-orientation is non-zero
Hello,
if I create a table I get sometimes the warning message:
"WARN - Sum of fixed column widths 52 greater than maximum specified IPD
507402" or something else.
That's why the sum of the column width is greater than the side.
Then I make the columns smaller and the messa
Todtenhaupt, Susann wrote:
Now I've localized my problem. Maybe in this point anybody could give
support. I have to set values in a dom-tree. But the specification of
dom-api says it's not possible to set a nodevalue of an element_node. How do
you set nodevalues for these nodes?
Elements don't hav
Todtenhaupt, Susann wrote:
While transforming with fop I always get the error-message:
At least one of minimum, optimum, or maximum IPD must be specified
on table.
The table width is usually calculated as the sum of the column
widths. If you missed supplying a width for some columns
place for those questions, but I hope somebody
could help...
Million thanx!
suse
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Todtenhaupt, Susann
Gesendet: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:37 AM
An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Betreff: IPD error
Hello @ all!
While transforming with fop I always g
been supplied.
-Original Message-
From: Todtenhaupt, Susann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:37 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: IPD error
Hello @ all!
While transforming with fop I always get the error-message:
At least one of minimum, optimum,
Hello @ all!
While transforming with fop I always get the error-message:
At least one of minimum, optimum, or maximum IPD must be specified
on table.
Furthermore I'm trying to get a value from a node in my xml-file by using
xsl:value-of select="foo". The foo-value re
22 matches
Mail list logo
