Title: RE: keep with next(Attribute)
You might want to look at XEP www.renderx.com
-Original Message-
From: Eclipse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 8:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: keep with next(Attribute)
thank you for answer.
here is my
al Message -
From: "Paul Vinkenoog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FOP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: keep with next(Attribute)
> Hi Sako,
>
> > may i ask, how do u solve the problem with keep with next?
> >
Hi Sako,
> may i ask, how do u solve the problem with keep with next?
> i mean when sometimes only one line shines in the next page. or
> only the title shines in one page and the text(paragraph) in the
> next?
keep-with-next is only implemented for table rows, so one solution is
Hello Folks,
may i ask, how do u solve the problem with
keep with next?
i mean when sometimes only one line shines in the
next page.
or only the title shines in one page and the
text(paragraph) in the next?
Regards.
sako.
Šoltís Ján wrote:
Could anybody help me with this task:
How to avoid FOP to place table header at the end of the page following with no
more rows on that page?
Setting keep-with-next on the last row of table's table-head doesn't work.
Table header is still at the bottom of the page.
Could anybody help me with this task:
How to avoid FOP to place table header at the end of the page following with no
more rows on that page?
Setting keep-with-next on the last row of table's table-head doesn't work.
Table header is still at the bottom of the page.
Assuming th
That worked. Thanks very much, enjoy your weekend.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 October 2003 04:25
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: keep-with-next
Frank Daly wrote:
>
Try keep-with-next="always". I thin
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Daly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I'm not sure which version of fop I'm using. I use cocoon 2.0.4 and fop
> came with that. This version of cocoon was released in march 2003.
>
That would probably be 0.20.4 or one of the 0.20.5 release candidates.
0.20
Frank Daly wrote:
I'm not sure which version of fop I'm using. I use cocoon 2.0.4 and fop
came with that. This version of cocoon was released in march 2003.
This was an 0.20.5RCsomething. You can drop in the latest FOP jar
from a binary distro without problems. It wont make a difference
with rega
Frank Daly wrote:
Try keep-with-next="always". I think FOP ignores "within-page"
and uses "within-column" only.
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
Original Message-
From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 October 2003 03:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: keep-with-next
>From: "Frank Daly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Hi
>
>I have a table which will list a number of clients. There are 2 o
From: "Frank Daly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi
I have a table which will list a number of clients. There are 2 or 3
rows displaying the details of each client. I want to keep these rows
together and have the following code fragment which I hoped would do
this
Your XSL-FO looks fine. keep-* properties
Hi
I have a table which will list a number of clients. There are 2 or 3
rows displaying the details of each client. I want to keep these rows
together and have the following code fragment which I hoped would do
this
Thanks for the info.
-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: keep-with-next, and keep-with-previous in blocks
Ganesh wrote:
> A block with keep-with-previous="always&q
Ganesh wrote:
A block with keep-with-previous="always" does not behave the way I want
it. Inspite of putting this tag for a block i have them splict between
pages.
a) Is it a non-implemented tag for fo:block?
b) Is there any work around to acheive the desired behaviour?
That's a FAQ:
http://xml.ap
From: "Ganesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi All,
A block with keep-with-previous="always" does not behave the way I want
it. Inspite of putting this tag for a block i have them splict between
pages.
a) Is it a non-implemented tag for fo:block?
b) Is there any work around to acheive the desired behaviour?
Title: Message
Hi
All,
A block with
keep-with-previous="always" does not behave the way I want it. Inspite of
putting this tag for a block i have them splict between
pages.
a) Is it a
non-implemented tag for fo:block?
b) Is there any work
around to acheive the desired behaviour?
Regards,
Bargel, Britta wrote:
I have two table-rows which should be on the same page. I have set the
propertie keep-wiht-next="always". Nevertheless those table rows are
separated by a page break.
If FOP can't fit a table onto a page due to keep constraints,
keeps are turned off for the rest of the table.
Hi,
I have the following problem.
I have two table-rows which should be on the same page. I have set the
propertie keep-wiht-next="always". Nevertheless those table rows are
separated by a page break.
Is there any known problem with the keep-properties?
Regards
Britta
---
Chris Bowditch wrote:
what you need to solve this problem is widow and orphan properties on
fo:block. They control the minimum number of lines that are allowed to
appear by themselves, either at the start of a new page or at the bottom
of an existing page. Trouble is they are not implemented in
From: Nicolas Mazziotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello,
I use blind tables to prevent titles from being severed from the following
block. But...
If the block is too large to fit on remaining the page, it is ``sent'' to
the next one.
If I remove the ``keep-with-next'' att
And if you set the keep-with-next only on the row with the title? That
will keep the title with at least one subseqent block.
On 28.05.2003 09:00:04 Nicolas Mazziotta wrote:
> I use blind tables to prevent titles from being severed from the
> following block. But...
> If the block is
|
|2nd block |
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
If I remove the ``keep-with-next'' att., of course, I get lonely titles
wandering at the bottom of some pages.
Than
more groups
..
I want each group of rows to stay together - so if e.g. the whole of Group 1
cannot fit onto the rest of the current page, then rather than splitting the
rows up, the whole of Group 1 should be shown on the next page. To achieve
this, I have used keep-with-next="alwa
groups
..
I want each group of rows to stay together - so if e.g. the whole of Group 1
cannot fit onto the rest of the current page, then rather than splitting the
rows up, the whole of Group 1 should be shown on the next page. To achieve
this, I have used keep-with-next="always&qu
Müller, Markus wrote:
according to the compliance document, keep-with-next is supported on table
rows. The sample file keep.fo also demonstrates keep-with-previous working.
But extending that sample in a way, that a table does not fit on two pages,
the keep-directives do not work any more. Making
adding appropriate attributes
to the items' corresponding xml-elements. The carry over values then are
placed into markers. Additionaly, always 3 items (= fo:table-rows) are set
to keep together using keep-with-next="always". Doing so, retrieving the
markers fails (first-starting
Hi all,
according to the compliance document, keep-with-next is supported on table
rows. The sample file keep.fo also demonstrates keep-with-previous working.
But extending that sample in a way, that a table does not fit on two pages,
the keep-directives do not work any more. Making separate
appropriate attributes
to the items' corresponding xml-elements. The carry over values then are
placed into markers. Additionaly, always 3 items (= fo:table-rows) are set
to keep together using keep-with-next="always". Doing so, retrieving the
markers fails (first-starting and last-ending)
Karen Mergner wrote:
I want to keep a headline together with the following text on a page,
but it dosn't work.
This is a FAQ
http://xml.apache.org/fop/faq.html#faq-N101F7
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i think keep with next work with table rows only
- Original Message -
From: "Karen Mergner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:23 AM
Subject: keep-with-next
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I want to keep a headline
Hi all,
I want to keep a headline together with the following text on a page,
but it dosn't work.
...headline...
...text...
What's wrong? Can someone help me?
Thanks, Karen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ask it nevertheless: 3 weeks, 3 month, 3 quarters, 3 years
Approximately !!
I have no idea actually, it's only a few people who are working on it right
now, but it's not a matter of years definitely.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn Technologies, Israel
--
On 19 Dec 2002 at 13:23, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > when will be supported the following attributes:
> When FOP1.0 is released. Don't ask when it'll happen.
>
> --
> Oleg Tkachenko
> eXperanto team
> Multiconn Technologies, Israel
>
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when will be supported the following attributes:
When FOP1.0 is released. Don't ask when it'll happen.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn Technologies, Israel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
Hallo,
when will be supported the following attributes:
Merry Xmas
Frens Peters
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eddy De Clercq wrote:
Thanks for the answer. Since there is no release date for implementing this,
are there alternatives for FOP which handle widow/orphans already?
You name it in the subject: blind table with keep-together properties on
table-rows.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn Tec
On Thursday 12 December 2002 08:26, Eddy De Clercq wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the answer. Since there is no release date for
> implementing this, are there alternatives for FOP which handle
> widow/orphans already?
Maybe you should check out XEP (http://www.renderx.com/FO2PDF.html).
It comes with
Wednesday, December 11, 2002 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: oprhan/window control, blind tables, keep-with-next etc
> Eddy De Clercq wrote:
>
> > I've seen in the archives lots of threads in the FOP mailing
> > list concerning this matter. Is ther any news/update on when features
like
, December 11, 2002 4:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: keep-with-next formatting problem
Matt Frame wrote:
> I have found when I use the keep-with-next and keep-with-previous
> attributes in my table that after a page break the formatting of the
row
> is lost. All text is left
Matt Frame wrote:
I have found when I use the keep-with-next and keep-with-previous
attributes in my table that after a page break the formatting of the row
is lost. All text is left justified instead of the indent I requested.
The final row on the previous page and next row after the break
Matthias Brunner wrote:
Is there a planned release date (+/- 3 months)?
No, unless "quite some time ago" counts.
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 17:13, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
> Eddy De Clercq wrote:
> > I've seen in the archives lots of threads in the FOP mailing
> > list concerning this matter. Is ther any news/update on when
> > features like orphan/widow control, keep-with-next wi
Eddy De Clercq wrote:
I've seen in the archives lots of threads in the FOP mailing
list concerning this matter. Is ther any news/update on when features like
orphan/widow control, keep-with-next will be implented in FOP and Cocoon?
Not really, they are addressed by the redesign under way.
--
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002
8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: keep-with-next formatting
problem
I have found when I use the
keep-with-next and keep-with-previous attributes in my table that after a page
break the formatting of the row is lost. All text is
I have found when I use the keep-with-next and
keep-with-previous attributes in my table that after a page break the
formatting of the row is lost. All text is left justified instead of the indent
I requested. The final row on the previous page and next row after the
break point on the
Hi,
I've seen in the archives lots of threads in
the FOP mailing list concerning this matter. Is ther any news/update on
when features like
orphan/widow control, keep-with-next will be
implented in FOP and Cocoon?
Many thanks
Eddy De Clercq
Morten Isaksen wrote:
I have a table cell that spans multiple pages. Inside this table cell I
would like to use the keep-with-next on a block to make sure this block
and the next block is at the same page.
FOP does not seem to care about this. The two blocks sometimes appears
on different pages
Hi!
I have a table cell that spans multiple pages. Inside this table cell I
would like to use the keep-with-next on a block to make sure this block
and the next block is at the same page.
FOP does not seem to care about this. The two blocks sometimes appears
on different pages.
Does FOP support
to me the above
should work. I'm using fop-0.20.4. Any alternatives/suggestions?
It works fine for me. Chances are you misunderstood the semantics a little
bit. keep-with-next constraint means that last area generated by the object
shouldn't be a trailing one within a context (page, colu
Title: keep-with-next and small-caps
I have two problems:
I'm trying to keep multiple rows together, like so:
[… cells …]
[… cells …]
[… cells …]
That doesn't seem to keep it together though (no changed behavior). I looked at xsl:fo tut
Peter Sparkes wrote:
Hi,
I have a repeating of data. Each instance of the block is of varying
size but under half a page. I want to put two blocks on every page, with
each block in its own half of the page and varying amounts of white space
between the two blocks.
However, I can't get it to work:
Hi,
I have a repeating of data. Each instance of the block is of varying
size but under half a page. I want to put two blocks on every page, with
each block in its own half of the page and varying amounts of white space
between the two blocks.
However, I can't get it to work: The two blocks clos
Martin Stockhammer wrote:
what about the state of keep-with-next in fo:block? I want to
keep headings together with their following paragraphs, but
keep-with-next="always" does not work within fo:block tags.
Is it planned to release a new version of fop in the near future?
It wont be i
Hello,
what about the state of keep-with-next in fo:block? I want to
keep headings together with their following paragraphs, but
keep-with-next="always" does not work within fo:block tags.
Is it planned to release a new version of fop in the near future?
Another question: Is it
I would like to keep together on a same page a "group" of table rows. I used
keep-with-next="always" and all except the last fo:table-row elements of the
"group", but for the attached XFO document (a course schedule), a page-break
occurs in the middle of a group of 9
I would like to keep together on a same page a "group" of table rows. I used
keep-with-next="always" and all except the last fo:table-row elements of the
"group", but for the attached XFO document (a course schedule), a page-break
occurs in the middle of a group of 9
I got it to work now using a new blind table with multiple rows
containing the whole stuff to keep together.
Thanks
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. April 2002 22:16
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: keep-with-next on one
Michael Heinen wrote:
I have a problem with the "keep-with-next" property.
I use an outer table containing a single row.
This row can contain multiple tables, blocks an so on depending on data.
I want to achieve, that data of the outer row is kept together on one page.
Michal Kwiatek wrote:
keep-with-next property does not seem to work. It is listed as 'implemented'
in documentation, however theres a 'broken' note next to it. Has anyone had
any experience with this one?
The properties keep-with-next and keep-with-previous are
only implemente
sday, April 09, 2002 5:20 AM
Subject: keep-with-next
> Hi!
>
> keep-with-next property does not seem to work. It is listed as
'implemented'
> in documentation, however theres a 'broken' note next to it. Has anyone
had
> any experience with this one?
>
> I
Hy all,
I have a problem with the "keep-with-next" property.
I use an outer table containing a single row.
This row can contain multiple tables, blocks an so on depending on data.
I want to achieve, that data of the outer row is kept together on one page.
But when I use
Hi!
keep-with-next property does not seem to work. It is listed as 'implemented'
in documentation, however theres a 'broken' note next to it. Has anyone had
any experience with this one?
I use block objects to implement headings. That why I need 'keep-with-next'
p
Title: keep-with-next workaround with table
I am using FOP 0.20.3.
According to "Features" : http://xml.apache.org/fop/implemented.html and some posts found on Google, the "keep-together" or "keep-with-next" property doesn't work ?
I would shar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: fop-dev@xml.apache.org
ix.com> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AW: keep-wit
I should be more specific - what I mean is; I would like to try to get
keep-with-next/previous working with fo:block elements.
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, David Wood wrote:
> I am a Java coder and know my way around the standard. I volunteer to try
> to fix this, if someone who is more familia
I am a Java coder and know my way around the standard. I volunteer to try
to fix this, if someone who is more familiar with FOP's internals can
tell me where to look...
-David
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Sam Prokop wrote:
> I found out it just works with table-rows, if you use keep-with-
I have had the same experience. It would be great if "keep-with-next"
could be fixed with the fo:block element.
Jarle
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Prokop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Su
I found out it just works with table-rows, if you use keep-with-next and
keep-with-previous.
and you have to take care, that the table doesn´t exceeds the page,
otherwise you´ll get a infinite-loop.
that´s all i found out :-(
Sam
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Costantino Se
Hello,
Is the keep-with-next attribute supported by FOP?
If yes, can anybody explain to me what I am doing wrong?
I have a "heading" template which I would like to keep together with the
following text, therefore I defined the following, but it doesn't work (the
following paragraph
70 matches
Mail list logo
