Prakash R wrote:
Can someone have a “box” (eg: table cell) set to a
specific height and width and say to have an image
scale to the size of that box??
In principle, yes. Unfortunately, FOP 0.20.5 doesn't
implement "height" properly, which may lead to an increased
height of the table row.
J.Pie
Can someone have a box (eg: table cell) set to a
specific height and width and say to have an image
scale to the size of that box??
If images are taller than the height, then scale by
height. But if images are wider than the widths, then
scale by width. But if both height and width are
higher, t
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
XSL 1.0, 6.4.19, fo:static-content says:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice6.html#fo_static-content
Contents:
(%block;)+
So you must at least have one block as a child for fo:static-content (It
can be empty). The redesigned FOP is much more strict about the
interpretation o
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I wonder if we should add fox:outline again for backwards compatibility.
Hmm.
FOP 1.0 is a different application from 0.20.5. They are not
backwards-compatible, just like Struts 1.0.2 and 1.27 aren't. Users who
prefer the API of 0.20.5 can continue on with that ver
On 21.10.2005 18:11:17 a b wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Sorry about that, and thanks very much to both of you
> for your replies.
>
> I din´t say I´m using dockbook, together with xlstproc
> and fop.
>
> I´m just a newbie with all of this, but after your
> replies, I´ve managed to correct docbook-
Hello again,
Sorry about that, and thanks very much to both of you
for your replies.
I din´t say I´m using dockbook, together with xlstproc
and fop.
I´m just a newbie with all of this, but after your
replies, I´ve managed to correct docbook-xsl sources
to handle properly fo:bookmark-tree and it´
The snapshots are currently broken due to long path names. But that's
not the problem you're experiencing. The problem is that fox:outline [1]
is not implemented in FOP Trunk anymore. It has been superseded by the
new bookmark elements from XSL-FO 1.1 [2].
I wonder if we should add fox:outline aga
On Oct 21, 2005, at 16:43, a b wrote:
Hi,
But when I build them up and try to use them, I get an
error like this, more or less:
No element mapping definition found for
That's because in the trunk, bookmarks are now moved into the default
FO namespace. Bookmarks are an added feature of the
Helo there,
I´m using fop under a linux-debian box.
I´ve been trying to get the "trunk" version of fop,
from here:
http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/fop/
I´ve set up ant, and the last version of java sdk/jre.
I´ve donwloaded the last two versions by now, which
are:
fop_20051021104642.tar.gz
fop
The only weird thing I can see here is the extent property on the second
region-body. This property doesn't apply to region-body. BTW, it would
be much more fun to reproduce your problem if you posted a complete FO
file and stated the FOP version you are using. :-)
On 21.10.2005 13:47:56 Timo Habe
Hello FOP List,
i have a problem with overlapping regions. I have content of the
region-body that overlapps content from region-after.
You can see it on the screenshot:
http://www.emedia-office.de/fop/overlapping.png
i have defined my page as follows:
http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format";>
There are several commercial tools out there (Google is your friend)
which implement DataMatrix, but you'd have to integrate them into FOP
yourself. http://idautomation.com/java/ is probably the first address
for a commercial tool.
DataMatrix is very high on the task list for Barcode4J but it is
n
Hello FOP-Users,
I need to include DataMatrix Codes in PDFs and I wonder if someone has
experience with this.
Do you know any libraries that provide this feature?
Barcode4J only supports 1D-Barcodes, DataMatrix is a 2D-Barcode.
Thanks,
Alexander.
Alexander Schwartz
PLUS Finanzservice G
13 matches
Mail list logo
