Daniel Noll wrote:
snip/
fo:block margin-left=0pt margin-right=0pt unicode-bidi=embed
fo:block-container absolute-position=absolute left=16.0%
top=16.0%
fo:block
fo:inline margin-left=0pt margin-right=0pt1/fo:inline
/fo:block
/fo:block-container
snip/
I'm generating a PDF using FOP 0.20.5 which has some text in and some jpegs
using the fo:external-graphic tag.
Without the jpegs, i.e. if I put fo:external-graphic src='', the resultant
output PDF is approx. 3k.
When I insert the details of the location of the jpegs (640k each on local
Bert Strobbe wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have the following problem with fop 0.93 (and fop 0.92): in the XSL-FO
files we generate, the attributes page-width and page-height for the
simple-page-master are set to 210mm and 297mm depending on
portrait/landscape. The resulting PDF looks like expected
Have you tried the auto-rotate-landscape setting?
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.93/configuration.html#ps-renderer
On 19.03.2007 11:35:56 Bert Strobbe wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have the following problem with fop 0.93 (and fop 0.92): in the XSL-FO
files we generate, the attributes
On 19.03.2007 12:09:40 Diane wrote:
I'm generating a PDF using FOP 0.20.5 which has some text in and some jpegs
using the fo:external-graphic tag.
Without the jpegs, i.e. if I put fo:external-graphic src='', the resultant
output PDF is approx. 3k.
When I insert the details of the location
On Mar 19, 2007, at 10:02, Chris Bowditch wrote:
Hi Daniel / Chris,
snip/
fo:block margin-left=0pt margin-right=0pt unicode-
bidi=embed
fo:block-container absolute-position=absolute left=16.0%
top=16.0%
fo:block
fo:inline margin-left=0pt margin-right=0pt1/
On Mar 19, 2007, at 18:29, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
Daniel,
Posting this here because Bugzilla did not accept your address in the
cc: list.
snip/
So now the 1, 2 and 3 are all inside the outer box, but all at
the top left corner. This could be because the fo:block inside
the
I think I've found a fix for this bug, but since I'm not 100% --how
fitting :-)-- certain, could you compare the FO and check the PDF result
in Bugzilla 41894, and see if that matches the expectation?
It works now! Thankyou. :-)
I even tested it on a really awful example, an HTML file spat