FOP0.94 and FOP0.95beta use more memory than FOP0.20.5

2008-05-12 Thread LN
Hi all, I tested FOP-0.94, FOP-0.95beta and FOP-0.20.5 using pdfoutline.fo. I added more fo:block(simple text) to the pdfoutline.fo file until the size of this file is reached 7.74M. Both FOP-0.94 and FOP-0.95beta require at least 896M heap size to run and produce 1580 pages PDF document.

Re: FOP0.94 and FOP0.95beta use more memory than FOP0.20.5

2008-05-12 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On May 12, 2008, at 16:37, LN wrote: Hi I tested FOP-0.94, FOP-0.95beta and FOP-0.20.5 using pdfoutline.fo. I added more fo:block(simple text) to the pdfoutline.fo file until the size of this file is reached 7.74M. Both FOP-0.94 and FOP-0.95beta require at least 896M heap size to run

Re: Memory issue

2008-05-12 Thread Jean-François El Fouly
Jean-François El Fouly a écrit : So I hired the team member who's competent in profiler usage next week but I must say at the moment I'm still stuck :-( The sysadmins made a tarball from the staging server and copied everything to a similar server that has full profiling instrumentation

Re: FOP0.94 and FOP0.95beta use more memory than FOP0.20.5

2008-05-12 Thread LN
Andreas, I added multiple fo:blocks, each fo:block contains the same text (Exact text: Rather than performing transformation with an XSLT before invoking FOP, it is possible, if you use XT as your XSLT engine, to just call FOP and have it call XT for you. To do this, run the class

Re: FOP0.94 and FOP0.95beta use more memory than FOP0.20.5

2008-05-12 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On May 12, 2008, at 16:57, LN wrote: snip / All these fo:blocks are in the same page-sequence. That explains a lot. This is a known scalability issue. FOP has problems with very large page-sequences, as it is currently based on a total-fit approach for the entire page-sequence. If you