t;Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:20 AM
> Subject: Re: Apache errors
>
>
> What you want to do is currently not possible with FOP. FOP would need
> to implement XSL 1.1 features like flow-map support and multi
Jeremias, does 0.95 version work with XSL 1.1 features like flow-map
support and multiple fo:region-body elements.?
tks
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: Apache errors
What y
CTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:20 AM
> Subject: Re: Apache errors
>
>
> What you want to do is currently not possible with FOP. FOP would need
> to implement XSL 1.1 features like flow-map support and multiple
> fo:region-body elements.
>
> On 11.02.200
ught..you just killed me...any idea when those features could it be
implemented ?
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: Apache errors
What you want to do is currently not possib
se my poor
> knowledge..im trying to learn
>
>
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Bowditch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 8:55 AM
> Subject: Re: Apache errors
>
>
> > Cristian Ferrero wrot
ginal Message -
From: "Chris Bowditch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: Apache errors
Cristian Ferrero wrote:
Jeremias i did what you wrote, also i tried inserting a block with
span="all", but the problem is th
Cristian Ferrero wrote:
Jeremias i did what you wrote, also i tried inserting a block with
span="all", but the problem is that the table don't show all the
information, it doesn't continue in other page, if i dont write
position="absolute" it works good (the table continues in another page),
tainer position="absolute" top="15cm" left="10cm" >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> thank you very much
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent
Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 5:11 AM
Subject: Re: Apache errors
height="100%" on a block-container may not work correctly (absolute
values work fine, of course). I've noticed some strange behaviour there
but have never invest
height="100%" on a block-container may not work correctly (absolute
values work fine, of course). I've noticed some strange behaviour there
but have never investigated, yet. Furthermore, height="100%" sets:
block-progression-dimension.minimum="100%"
block-progression-dimension.optimum="100%"
block-
st question for this week..is my promise (i couldn't pot the
question because the mail server is giving me an error)
thanks !
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: Ap
On 08.02.2008 13:23:18 Cristian Ferrero wrote:
> Really thanks Mathias...i will follow your advice. another question...is
> there a way to configure another unit of measures for position (i mean
> centimetres for example) instead of 0pt..like this example...
> width="49.0pt"
Sure, see here
Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 4:41 AM
Subject: Re: Apache errors
Christian,
the problem, as far as I understand it, is that XSLFast still produces
XSL-FO optimized for FOP 0.20.5 (I think they still use that version
internally). And 0.20.5 was too lenien
te your help
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 11:58 AM
> Subject: Re: Apache errors
>
>
> Your top-level template listens to "IMPFACT", but your XML co
o:
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: Apache errors
Your top-level template listens to "IMPFACT", but your XML contains
"IMPFAC" as the top-level element. Because of that the template is never
triggered and instead default templates provided by XSLT are bei
Your top-level template listens to "IMPFACT", but your XML contains
"IMPFAC" as the top-level element. Because of that the template is never
triggered and instead default templates provided by XSLT are being used
and they just output the node content found. That's why the generated FO
looks more li
ginal Message -
From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: Apache errors
You'll have a much easier time if you just run the XSLT transformation
without FOP. Then you can inspect the generated XSL-FO. That shou
just run it with apache or i have to
> desist and make my xsl "manually"..
>
> i attach my xsl and my xml too.thanks and sorry if i make dummy
> questions---
>
>
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Message -
From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: Apache errors
You'll have a much easier time if you just run the XSLT transformation
without FOP. Then you can inspect the generated XSL-FO. That should help
>From my quick look, I suspect at least one problem may lie with this
test:
You have the test enclosing the contents of the table-cell, but I think
you should have the test around the table-header that holds the
table-cell instead. If the test fails, I believe you want to skip the
entire table-h
You'll have a much easier time if you just run the XSLT transformation
without FOP. Then you can inspect the generated XSL-FO. That should help
you figure out the problem. On the command-line you can use the -foout
option instead of -pdf to just generated the XSL-FO file.
BTW, posting an XSLT alon
21 matches
Mail list logo
