Re: [foreman-dev] Issues with support of IPv6/DHCPv6 in Smart-Proxy

I'm sorry I was a little confused, I thought we were talking about adding support for fixed-address6 to foreman. Not adding better support to ISC DHCP On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Dmitri Dolguikh wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Perry Gagne

Re: [foreman-dev] Issues with support of IPv6/DHCPv6 in Smart-Proxy

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Perry Gagne wrote: > Wouldn't it be better to add support for fixed-address6 or is there some > issue with doing that? It looks to me like ISC aren’t really interested in extending functionality of dhcpd. On top of this, it may actually be more

Re: [foreman-dev] Issues with support of IPv6/DHCPv6 in Smart-Proxy

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Perry Gagne wrote: >> This is definitely the case as far as ipv6-specific dhcpd >> configuration goes. The code I linked to is responsible for >> persistence of in-memory host records, and it doesn’t support ipv6 at >> all. > > Maybe I am

Re: [foreman-dev] Issues with support of IPv6/DHCPv6 in Smart-Proxy

> > This is definitely the case as far as ipv6-specific dhcpd > configuration goes. The code I linked to is responsible for > persistence of in-memory host records, and it doesn’t support ipv6 at > all. Maybe I am confused. Are you trying to add support for fixed-address6 or trying to work around

Re: [foreman-dev] Issues with support of IPv6/DHCPv6 in Smart-Proxy

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Dmitri Dolguikh wrote: >> - It is difficult to determine host’s client id (dhcp unique identifier, AKA >> DUID) > > What you mean by that? If sysadmins let DUID to

Re: [foreman-dev] Issues with support of IPv6/DHCPv6 in Smart-Proxy

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Dmitri Dolguikh wrote: > - It is difficult to determine host’s client id (dhcp unique identifier, AKA > DUID) What you mean by that? If sysadmins let DUID to change, they are breaking IPv6 specs and servers will mis-behave. What exactly are