+1 to amending the original text and see how that feels in practice.
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:38:11AM -0400, Andrew Kofink wrote:
> I have made the change to amend the body of the pull request with the links
> to the issues, which shouldn't send a new notification/email. This will be
> a
Will do :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Tomas,
Would it be easier to print the parent with list/info commands and allow
updating that attribute (i.e. --parent/--parent-id)? We already have a
handler in the ID resolver when multiple records are returned when only one
is expected, though the error message does not tell the user how to
Greg,
If you would like to start a discussion for inclusion of MIQ bot, please
start a new thread. :)
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Greg Sutcliffe
wrote:
> While we're talking about modifying PrProcessor, some of the automatic
> and requested task options in the
I have made the change to amend the body of the pull request with the links
to the issues, which shouldn't send a new notification/email. This will be
a per-repo configuration. If you'd like for a repository to be included in
the change, please let me know via email, or comment on the pull request
While we're talking about modifying PrProcessor, some of the automatic
and requested task options in the MIQ bot are pretty cool - maybe we
should steal^W copy those in? :P. I can definitely see uses for
add/remove labels, at least.
https://github.com/ManageIQ/miq_bot?#automatic-tasks
Greg
--
On pátek 7. dubna 2017 14:35:41 CEST John Mitsch wrote:
> The greasmonkey script works great! Really helpful, thanks for sharing. For
> those who are wondering (like I was), it requires the greasemonkey browser
> plugin:
>
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/greasemonkey/ or
>
>
I think this is a great idea, being able to configure and populate multiple
Katello servers from a git repository is something I'm going to be doing in
a couple of months and this sound perfect for it!
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 at 16:04, Eric D Helms wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I have a
Tests in the pipeline for 1.15 RC1 rpms & debs passed on Friday -
http://ci.theforeman.org/view/Release%20pipeline/job/release_test/106/
Plan is to announce the release tomorrow, according to the shared
planning with Katello 3.4 RC1. You can see our tentative calendar
here: