Anthony Wong wrote:
Daniel, could you help me on checking
my package at http://ypwong.org/debian/rifiuti2/ please?
imported at git.debian.net, see
http://git.debian.net/?p=debian-forensics/rifiuti2.git
please send me your public ssh key so that i can add you to the list of
commiters.
i've
Anthony Wong wrote:
Sorry and thanks for your care. just a quick answer, we're definitely
not in a deadlock situation,
ah, good.
but just because I'm currently in a vacation :)
oh, sorry for disturbing then. not ment to pressure you in any way.
FYI version 0.5.1 upstream tarball has been
Hi Daniel,
Sorry and thanks for your care. just a quick answer, we're definitely not in
a deadlock situation, but just because I'm currently in a vacation :)
FYI version 0.5.1 upstream tarball has been released, and I've already made
the changes into the google svn. Will upload the debian package
Daniel Baumann wrote:
However, I'll import it and have a look at the package this evening or
tomorrow morning.
umm, i just visited the project site of rifituti2. could you please
first release the upstream version 0.5.1 tarball and do *not* include
the debian direcory inside that. after that,
Le vendredi 28 novembre 2008 à 09:10 +0100, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
about rifituti2..
either both the source and binary package will be named rifituti2, then
we can upload this alongside to rifituti, and once it passed NEW, remove
rifituti. advantage: it's fair against previous upstream to
2008/11/26 Christophe Monniez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I don't know how to resolve the conflicting problem.
I think that my old rifiuti package could be removed from Debian as
rifiuti2 has the same functionalities and even more.
Or maybe you could rename your binary rifiuti2 to let them
