Re: [Patch, fortran] PR67740 - Wrong association status of allocatable character pointer in derived types

2023-10-11 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Hi Harald and Bernhard, Indeed, you are right about the space. However, the compile is intentional. This catches the fix: ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "co._data1_length = 10;" 1 "original" } } Also, it helps to get the PR number right! I was rushing to get the patch out before leaving for

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: name conflict between internal procedure and derived type [PR104351]

2023-10-11 Thread Harald Anlauf
Dear All, sorry for attaching the wrong patch - this time it is the correct one! Harald On 10/11/23 21:39, Harald Anlauf wrote: Dear All, the attached trivial patch fixes (= catches) a forgotten corner-case in the detection of a name conflict between an internal procedure and a local declarat

[PATCH] Fortran: name conflict between internal procedure and derived type [PR104351]

2023-10-11 Thread Harald Anlauf
Dear All, the attached trivial patch fixes (= catches) a forgotten corner-case in the detection of a name conflict between an internal procedure and a local declaration for the case that the latter is a derived type. Another torture test by Gerhard... ;-) Used to ICE previously. Regtested on x86

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR67740 - Wrong association status of allocatable character pointer in derived types

2023-10-11 Thread Harald Anlauf
Hi Paul, the patch is fine, but I forgot the mention that the testcase needs fixing: Instead of ! {dg-do compile } you'll likely want ! { dg-do run } (Note the space before the dg-command.) Cheers, Harald On 10/11/23 21:06, Harald Anlauf wrote: Hi Paul, On 10/11/23 10:48, Paul Richard Th

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR67740 - Wrong association status of allocatable character pointer in derived types

2023-10-11 Thread Harald Anlauf
Hi Paul, On 10/11/23 10:48, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: Hi All, The title line of the PR should have been changed a long time since. As noted in comment 5, the original problem was fixed in 10.5. This patch fixes the problem described in comments 4 and 6, where the hidden string length componen

[Patch, fortran] PR67740 - Wrong association status of allocatable character pointer in derived types

2023-10-11 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Hi All, The title line of the PR should have been changed a long time since. As noted in comment 5, the original problem was fixed in 10.5. This patch fixes the problem described in comments 4 and 6, where the hidden string length component was not being set in pointer assignment of character arr