Re: [fossil-users] c style (was: How to contribute?)

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Andres Perera wrote: > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > I need to work up checklists for coding style and design rules. I > started > > on a testing checklist which you can see at > > http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/test/releas

Re: [fossil-users] switch statement

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Higham, Paul wrote: > Did you try [switch $status { . . . ? Same error: no such command: switch ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fo

Re: [fossil-users] switch statement

Did you try [switch $status { . . . ? Paul Higham Tel +1 408 522 6225 phig...@sjm.com -Original Message- From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org [mailto:fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org] On Behalf Of Ron Wilson Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 16:03 To: fossil-users@list

Re: [fossil-users] switch statement

Thanks. On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Andreas Kupries wrote: > On 2/17/2011 4:02 PM, Ron Wilson wrote: >> Does TH1 implement switch > > AFAIK no. > > Grep the fossil sources for '** TH' (pattern '\*\* TH'). ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@

Re: [fossil-users] switch statement

On 2/17/2011 4:02 PM, Ron Wilson wrote: > Does TH1 implement switch AFAIK no. Grep the fossil sources for '** TH' (pattern '\*\* TH'). -- Andreas Kupries Senior Tcl Developer ActiveState, The Dynamic Language Experts P: 778.786.1122 F: 778.786.1133 andre...@activestate.com http://www.activesta

[fossil-users] switch statement

Does TH1 implement switch or am I using it wrong? The TCL (yes, I know TH1 is not TCL, only derived from it) docs at http://www.tcl.tk/man/tcl8.5/TclCmd/switch.htm say the switch returns the result of evaluating the body associated with the matching pattern, so that is what I tried: set statu

Re: [fossil-users] Clone of the main repo fails on Windows XP

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov < flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > I tried to clone the main fossil repository over HTTP on Windows XP > using the latest stable fossil version available in the "downloads" > section on the main site. Cloning fails with weird error mes

[fossil-users] c style (was: How to contribute?)

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > I need to work up checklists for coding style and design rules.  I started > on a testing checklist which you can see at > http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/test/release-checklist.wiki but > it needs a lot of work yet. about style:

[fossil-users] Clone of the main repo fails on Windows XP

I tried to clone the main fossil repository over HTTP on Windows XP using the latest stable fossil version available in the "downloads" section on the main site. Cloning fails with weird error messages, screenshot of two cloning attempts is [1]. Any idea about what's happening and how to fix this

Re: [fossil-users] How to contribute?

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 02:18:01PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > Another reader suggested through a side-channel that I adapt the language > here: > > http://oss.oracle.com/oca.pdf I suggested it for two important reasons: 1) The original version from Sun is used as base by a number of legal enti

Re: [fossil-users] How to contribute?

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Ivan Hamer wrote: > > Oracle's agreement addresses the contributor as either programmer or > company, which is a plus. I also find it easier to follow. http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/copyright-release.pdf http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/t

Re: [fossil-users] How to contribute?

Oracle's agreement addresses the contributor as either programmer or company, which is a plus. I also find it easier to follow. On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:44:26PM -0500, Richard Hip

Re: [fossil-users] How to contribute?

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:44:26PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > > http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/artifact/17a59e2687887 - Or this? > > I have two comments about this, at this time: > >This agreement applies only to any software, docu

Re: [fossil-users] How to contribute?

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:44:26PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > > http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/artifact/17a59e2687887 - Or this? I have two comments about this, at this time: This agreement applies only to any software, documentation, scripts, of other content that has been deliberat

Re: [fossil-users] ticket opened date

I'm using fossil 1-jan-2011; maybe 'date' is a recent addition? I'll try again. Stephen On Thursday, February 17, 2011, Ron Wilson wrote: > It looks like you doing the same as I did, so I have no idea why it is > not working for you. > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle >

Re: [fossil-users] ticket opened date

It looks like you doing the same as I did, so I have no idea why it is not working for you. On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > I tried what your suggested, but to no effect. > I believe including the >    set date_opened [ string range [ date ] 0 10 ] > sets the $" to

Re: [fossil-users] Removing the need for anonymous login...

Or what if the href= component of hyperlinks was mangled in some way (for user "nobody") but then some javascript is run after the page loads to unmangle the hyperlinks. Would that work? On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Zed A. Shaw w

Re: [fossil-users] How to contribute?

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Ivan Hamer wrote: > >> >> Hi Richard, >> >> I looked at the agreement form, and it is pretty all-encompassing. Since >> my company integrates fossil into its product, the agreement seems to imply >>

Re: [fossil-users] Removing the need for anonymous login...

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Zed A. Shaw wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 09:34:49AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On the http://www.fossil-scm.org/ website (which, as you know, is really > > just an instance of Fossil running as CGI) I have added to the Fossil > > header: > > > > > >

Re: [fossil-users] Removing the need for anonymous login...

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Zed A. Shaw wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:03:23AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Stephan Beal > wrote: > > Exactly - the problem isn't Google/Yahoo/Bing but rogue spiders that > ignore > > NOFOLLOW and robots.txt. > > Even

Re: [fossil-users] How to contribute?

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Ivan Hamer wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > I looked at the agreement form, and it is pretty all-encompassing. Since > my company integrates fossil into its product, the agreement seems to imply > that all of that work would then belong to Hwaci. I am pretty sure y

Re: [fossil-users] Removing the need for anonymous login...

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 09:34:49AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > On the http://www.fossil-scm.org/ website (which, as you know, is really > just an instance of Fossil running as CGI) I have added to the Fossil > header: > > I have an idea that might work. What you want is a way to make sure

Re: [fossil-users] How to contribute?

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Ivan Hamer wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > I looked at the agreement form, and it is pretty all-encompassing. Since > my company integrates fossil into its product, the agreement seems to imply > that all of that work would then belong to Hwaci. I am pretty sure y

Re: [fossil-users] Removing the need for anonymous login...

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:03:23AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > Exactly - the problem isn't Google/Yahoo/Bing but rogue spiders that ignore > NOFOLLOW and robots.txt. Even google and the others ignore this. I've been on a few projects where

Re: [fossil-users] How to contribute?

Hi Richard, I looked at the agreement form, and it is pretty all-encompassing. Since my company integrates fossil into its product, the agreement seems to imply that all of that work would then belong to Hwaci. I am pretty sure your intent was to get the release on the contributions only, but

Re: [fossil-users] SSH status

I tried cloning via SSH, it's now work well. Just one small thing. I don't know if it's my setup, but I get the following warning: Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal. Just after showing the ssh command line, which is only something like: ssh me@hostname my

Re: [fossil-users] Removing the need for anonymous login...

On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Justin Mazzi wrote: > He's talking about 'nobody', not 'anonymous'. Thanks; I also meant Nobody, and said Anonymous erroneously. e > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Doug Currie wrote: > > On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Justin Mazzi wrote: > > > Disabling Zips &

Re: [fossil-users] Removing the need for anonymous login...

He's talking about 'nobody', not 'anonymous'. On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Doug Currie wrote: > > On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Justin Mazzi wrote: > > > Disabling Zips & Diff generation seems like the most sensible option. > > Anonymous zips are important to allow for access by users of pa

Re: [fossil-users] Removing the need for anonymous login...

On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Justin Mazzi wrote: > Disabling Zips & Diff generation seems like the most sensible option. Anonymous zips are important to allow for access by users of packaging systems (luarocks, ruby gems) that grab the zip based on a URI in the package specification. So, I h

Re: [fossil-users] Removing the need for anonymous login...

Disabling Zips & Diff generation seems like the most sensible option. On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >>> I wonder if the NOFOLLOW thing should be in the

Re: [fossil-users] Removing the need for anonymous login...

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > >> I wonder if the NOFOLLOW thing should be in the default header generated >> by Fossil? >> > > It "probably should", but nofollow is of course just a suggestion, and > malicious bots w

Re: [fossil-users] Removing the need for anonymous login...

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > I wonder if the NOFOLLOW thing should be in the default header generated by > Fossil? > It "probably should", but nofollow is of course just a suggestion, and malicious bots won't give it a second glance. While i dislike the minor annoyance

[fossil-users] Removing the need for anonymous login...

An obscure project that uses Fossil and is hosted by the www.fossil-scm.orgserver suddenly shot up into the top-10 bandwidth users yesterday. I investigated to see why and found that they had removed the requirement of doing an anonymous login before seeing hyperlinks. (In other words, they had a

Re: [fossil-users] SSH status

2011/2/17 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > I've had troubles with 'dropbear' loading the proper scripts. > > Does your provider use openssh? > It appears to be. ssh --help output looks like my local ssh's output (but doesn't name the product) and 'man ssh' says it's openssh. They use Linux servers, so i

Re: [fossil-users] SSH status

On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:38:08 -0500 Ron Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > > I've been rummaging through the list archives, and sifting through the > > Web documentation, but I am still not clear on the status of using SSH to > > encrypt connections for push/pu

Re: [fossil-users] ticket opened date

Hi, I tried what your suggested, but to no effect. I believe including the set date_opened [ string range [ date ] 0 10 ] sets the $" to the current date in the value field of the relevant input. date View source on the new ticket page shows nothing date I'm using Fossil version [79b7902cd

Re: [fossil-users] SSH status

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > >> My current approach is to run ssh to a shell on the remote side and then >> issue shell command over the wire that invoke Fossil multiple times to act >> as a server for the client-si

Re: [fossil-users] SSH status

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:42:19AM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: > 2011/2/17 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > i have a bashrc configured on that box, which includes ~/bin in my path, and > my bash_profile simply sources bashrc, but the hoster has apparently done > something to their ssh which causes those to

Re: [fossil-users] SSH status

2011/2/17 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > Please correct me if I am wrong; I just think that noone finds this > information of > any relevance in this thread. > That's my understanding as well, but i get the same results with: ssh -T host 'echo $PATH' ssh host 'echo $PATH' i have a bashrc configured

Re: [fossil-users] SSH status

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:04:12AM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > My current approach is to run ssh to a shell on the remote side and then > > issue shell command over the wire that invoke Fossil multiple times to act > > as a server for th

Re: [fossil-users] SSH status

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > My current approach is to run ssh to a shell on the remote side and then > issue shell command over the wire that invoke Fossil multiple times to act > as a server for the client-side protocol. It's all a bit dodgy. > git uses this approach

Re: [fossil-users] raw (internal) wiki pages

2011/2/16 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > This is related: > http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview?name=7c36bea9f3 > When following that link to: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact?name=e23719b08c7d5edc6d19d271f249edf871c1cd8a&txt=1