On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:03:06PM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote:
Le 2011-07-10 à 11:05, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk a écrit :
Answering the question about breaking existing scripts, the output is
identical when used at the root. Unless you're running scripts in a
sub-directory, nothing
On 22 Jul 2011, at 12:03, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:03:06PM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote:
Le 2011-07-10 à 11:05, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk a écrit :
Answering the question about breaking existing scripts, the output is
identical when used at the root. Unless
So I created the 'autosetup' branch and added a commit which drh then merged to
trunk.
Is that branch now defunct? If I want to propose some more, related changes,
do I create a new branch, say autosetup2, or do I continue or resurrect the
autosetup branch?
If so, how?
Thanks,
Steve
--
µWeb:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:33PM +0100, Ben Summers wrote:
On 22 Jul 2011, at 12:03, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:03:06PM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote:
Le 2011-07-10 à 11:05, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk a écrit :
Answering the question about breaking
On 22 Jul 2011, at 13:09, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:33PM +0100, Ben Summers wrote:
On 22 Jul 2011, at 12:03, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:03:06PM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote:
Le 2011-07-10 à 11:05, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.auwrote:
So I created the 'autosetup' branch and added a commit which drh then
merged to trunk.
Is that branch now defunct? If I want to propose some more, related
changes,
do I create a new branch, say autosetup2, or do I
On Jul 22, 2011, at 13:57 , Steve Bennett wrote:
So I created the 'autosetup' branch and added a commit which drh then merged
to trunk.
Is that branch now defunct?
If your changes are well integrated into trunk, and you're not continuing
development in isolation from trunk, you should
On Jul 22, 2011, at 14:46 , Richard Hipp wrote:
fossil commit --branch autosetup --bgcolor '#91d680'
The --bgcolor on the last commit is optional. But it is nice to have color
on branches. If you forget it, it can be added later using the Edit feature
of the UI. (That's how I added
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski
l...@maxnet.org.plwrote:
By the way: this is one of the more cumbersome things about the UI. I'd
really like to see this done automatically. But then again, I don't feel
like wasting my time on this, so I don't expect anyone to waste
Fossil thinks my configure script is binary. This probably due
to one or more chars like ^H or something like that.
Is there a way to convince fossil that it is not binary?
And I don't want to change the configure script!
--
Rene
___
fossil-users
On Jul 22, 2011, at 15:50 , Stephan Beal wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski
l...@maxnet.org.plwrote:
By the way: this is one of the more cumbersome things about the UI. I'd
really like to see this done automatically. But then again, I don't feel
like wasting my
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Rene renew...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Fossil thinks my configure script is binary. This probably due
to one or more chars like ^H or something like that.
Is there a way to convince fossil that it is not binary?
And I don't want to change the configure script!
More
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl
wrote:
By the way: this is one of the more cumbersome things about the UI. I'd
really like to see this done automatically. But then again, I
Hello,
I am a fossil newcomer trying to see if it can fit our selfhosted-SCM
dreams.
I noticed that actually fossil does not support ipv6 (it is using
AF_INET socket)
Yet I was able to reach my fossil repo from an ipv6 adress inspiried
by :
http://www.sqlite.org/debug1/tktview?name=b0894abc94
At 05:54 AM 7/22/2011, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote:
On Jul 22, 2011, at 14:46 , Richard Hipp wrote:
The --bgcolor on the last commit is optional. But it is nice
to have color on branches.
By the way: this is one of the more cumbersome things about the
UI. I'd really like to see this
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com wrote:
It would be nice if branches had a default color distinct from
the trunk. ... One way to do that that *might* be ... generate a hash of
the branch tag
name and use it for the color.
Do you have a suggested hash
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 03:14:38PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com wrote:
It would be nice if branches had a default color distinct from
the trunk. ... One way to do that that *might* be ... generate a hash of
the branch tag
2011/7/22 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com
Maybe my opinion is of little value, but I like what fossil is currently
doing
with branches and colors. I use it since months and I'm very happy with it,
not
needing anything more.
Basically everything Fossil's added since early 2008 has
At 12:14 PM 7/22/2011, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Ross Berteig
r...@cheshireeng.com wrote:
It would be nice if branches had a default color distinct from
the trunk. ... One way to do that that *might* be ... generate a
hash of the branch tag name and use it for
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com wrote:
For skins that are dark text on white background, then using the
existing MD5 hash on the tag name, picking a convenient three;
...
it would make an entertaining experiment, whether or not it turns out to be
useful in
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.comwrote:
For skins that are dark text on white background, then using the
existing MD5 hash on the tag name, picking a convenient three;
...
it
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
An experimental change to implement this is on the server. Add the brbg
query parameter to the timeline method to have the background color set by
branch name. Add ubg to have the background color set by user name.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.comwrote:
For skins that are dark text on white background, then using the
At 04:25 PM 7/22/2011, Richard Hipp wrote:
An experimental change to implement this is on the server...
I tried Ross's proposed color choosing algorithm but it didn't
work out. So instead I used the hash to select a Hue in an HSV
color space, held the S and V fixed, and mapped the result
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
Feedback is encouraged. Remember this changes is experimental and might
disappear at any moment!
Looks very nice. The pastel colors do a great job on white with black
text. I'd say a worthwhile feature. Is there an easy way
25 matches
Mail list logo
