Firefox gave the message I quoted.
Chrome said that the server returned no data.
Safari just shows an empty page.
Telnet to the relevant port returns no data.
I have local copies of the sqlite and fossil repositories with some
extra tickets for myself, and a branch paralleling release which
differ
Disabling 'Show version differences by default' in the Timeline
configuration enables access to at least some of these changes.
Doing this with fossil checkin cff9cc34f0 enables me to see the
checkin data. I am able to view the differences as a patch or as a
unified diff, but the side-by-side diff
* Andrew Stuart [20120531 16:15]:
> There are source code files and also operating system configuration
> files.
I would keep two different repositories. For the second one, see below.
> I use sudo to edit these files as most of the files are editable only
> by root.
>
> How do I use Fossil i
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Joan Picanyol i Puig <
lists-fos...@biaix.org> wrote:
> * Andrew Stuart [20120531 16:15]:
> > There are source code files and also operating system configuration
> > files.
>
> I would keep two different repositories. For the second one, see below.
>
And i would
Le 2012-06-07 à 05:30, Joan Picanyol i Puig a écrit :
> * Andrew Stuart [20120531 16:15]:
>> There are source code files and also operating system configuration
>> files.
>
> I would keep two different repositories. For the second one, see below.
>
>> I use sudo to edit these files as most of
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Christopher Vance wrote:
> Firefox gave the message I quoted.
> Chrome said that the server returned no data.
> Safari just shows an empty page.
> Telnet to the relevant port returns no data.
>
Ok. Good clue.
It appears that the Fossil binary is segfaulting while
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Joan Picanyol i Puig <
> lists-fos...@biaix.org> wrote:
>
>> * Andrew Stuart [20120531 16:15]:
>> > There are source code files and also operating system configuration
>> > files.
>>
>> I would keep two differ
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Richie Adler wrote:
> Thomas Schnurrenberger decía, en el mensaje "Re: [fossil-users] Problem
> with
> "fossil winsrv" (cont'd)" del Miércoles, 06 de Junio de 2012 17:35:59:
> > On 06.06.2012 20:59, Marcelo wrote:
> >>
> >> What do you think of my proposed change?
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 06:36:23AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Christopher Vance wrote:
>
> > Firefox gave the message I quoted.
> > Chrome said that the server returned no data.
> > Safari just shows an empty page.
> > Telnet to the relevant port returns no data.
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 12:46:07PM +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 06:36:23AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Christopher Vance wrote:
> >
> > > Firefox gave the message I quoted.
> > > Chrome said that the server returned no data.
> >
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 06:36:23AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Christopher Vance >wrote:
> >
> > > Firefox gave the message I quoted.
> > > Chrome said that the server returned no data.
> > > Safari
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 06:51:55AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 06:36:23AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Christopher Vance > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Firefox gave the mes
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote:
> sure it would be nice to keep permission and ownership may be storing
> the output of: ls -ln $(fossil ls) in the repo could be used from a
> script to check/restore permissions...
>
Permissions are a touchy subject because they're in
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> and fossil tries to be platform-agnostic insofar as is feasible. Once
> fossil has Unix permissions support, people will want extended attributes
> support, ACLs, and other weird stuff (not that Unix permissions aren't
> weird, but they are th
Is there any status on this? rejected ? still under review ?
regards,
Bapt
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Baptiste Daroussin <
baptiste.darous...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any status on this? rejected ? still under review ?
>
DRH swamped. But it is on the list of potential changes for the Fossil
Code Sprint in Munich on July 3!
>
> regards,
> Bapt
>
At Thu, 7 Jun 2012 12:11:00 +0200,
Stephan Beal wrote:
> And i would go one step further and NOT use fossil for the system files.
> Fossil does not support file permissions
> other than the +x bit and does not understand user/group ownership. Without
> that, using it for managing system-level
> f
I have one central repository, that I use as an archive for a web site. The web
site root directory is actually checkout of the trunk
branch of the repository.
I am using lighttpd server on Linux and fossil as a CGI script in very standard
manner.
So, I need when I make a push (or commit with aut
[attempting to regroup subthreads]
[if short on time, please skim to the end to comment on the design]
* Martin Gagnon [20120607 12:06]:
> Le 2012-06-07 à 05:30, Joan Picanyol i Puig a écrit :
> > * Andrew Stuart [20120531 16:15]:
> >> There are source code files and als
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote:
> > The repo file itself needs to live somewhere outside of the "source
> tree."
>
> I'm not convinced this is true, in fact I believe I've had the repo at
> the root of the checkout some times.
>
Sorry, i was thinking of another case:
20 matches
Mail list logo
