Re: [fossil-users] some questions about fossil-as-document-repo

2013-01-16 Thread Graeme Gill
C. Thomas Stover wrote: > On the other hand, if you are trying to do actual collaborative work on > documents, then it is absolutely critical that in addition to a SCM > system (fossil would be great), that you move to a text/source based > document generation technology. The real problem is a la

Re: [fossil-users] some questions about fossil-as-document-repo

2013-01-16 Thread Tomek Kott
Might I suggest the following two tools as better suited for this sort of endeavor? 1) Zotero - http://www.zotero.org/ 2) PDF XChange for free OCR - http://www.tracker-software.com/product/pdf-xchange-viewer The first is a good pdf sorter that can work in "stand alone mode." You can also tag

Re: [fossil-users] [v1.23] How to show timeline -showfiles as default in ui?

2013-01-16 Thread sky5walk
DOH! Easier than I thought. fossil ui admin - configuration - index page = /timeline?n=20&fc On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:55 PM, wrote: > fossil ui > admin - configuration - index page = /timeline -showfiles > > I got this unrecoverable error using Chrome. > "This webpage has a redirect loop >

Re: [fossil-users] timeline bug?

2013-01-16 Thread j. v. d. hoff
for completeness sake: did not hit 'reply all' the first time (thus skipped replying to the list), so here it is. On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:55:48 +0100, Eric wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:48:52 +0100, "j. van den hoff" wrote: hi, incidentally (when calling fossil from with a script construc

Re: [fossil-users] some questions about fossil-as-document-repo

2013-01-16 Thread C. Thomas Stover
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:11:49 -0600 Carson Chittom wrote: > Yes, basically, it's the "probably should save for later" need--mostly > for legal reasons. Currently all this is in hardcopy, as I mentioned, > the volume of which has reached such a level as to be simply > impenetrable; part of the rea

Re: [fossil-users] some questions about fossil-as-document-repo

2013-01-16 Thread Carson Chittom
"C. Thomas Stover" writes: > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:37:46 -0600 > Carson Chittom wrote: > >> While I realize that this is a somewhat different emphasis than >> fossil's usual orientation, I have suggested to my work superiors >> that fossil may be usable for us as a document repository, given it

[fossil-users] [v1.23] How to show timeline -showfiles as default in ui?

2013-01-16 Thread sky5walk
fossil ui admin - configuration - index page = /timeline -showfiles I got this unrecoverable error using Chrome. "This webpage has a redirect loop The webpage at http://127.0.0.1:8080/timeline%20-showfiles has resulted in too many redirects. Clearing your cookies for this site or allowing third-

Re: [fossil-users] timeline bug?

2013-01-16 Thread Eric
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:48:52 +0100, "j. van den hoff" wrote: > hi, > > incidentally (when calling fossil from with a script constructing the > suitable call) I noted that > > +fossil timeline ''+ > > (i.e. appending an empty string '' after `timeline') shows the timeline > below (and i

Re: [fossil-users] [Open Manufacturing] Fwd: [thingiverse] developing an alternative site?

2013-01-16 Thread Eugen Leitl
- Forwarded message from John Griessen - From: John Griessen Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:39:18 -0600 To: openmanufactur...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Open Manufacturing] Fwd: [thingiverse] developing an alternative site? User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/2013010

Re: [fossil-users] timeline bug?

2013-01-16 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:54 PM, j. van den hoff wrote: > thanks for clarification. I understand that empty arguments can make sense > in some cases > (whether empty commits really do, we don't quite agree, obviously...) but > I nevertheless don't understand > what > We probably do agree - i desp

Re: [fossil-users] timeline bug?

2013-01-16 Thread j. van den hoff
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:28:24 +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:48 PM, j. van den hoff wrote: is this a bug or a feature? I do hope the former since it's really bad behaviour when driving `fossil' with a script. It's an "as designed bug." The argument handling is based

Re: [fossil-users] timeline bug?

2013-01-16 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:48 PM, j. van den hoff wrote: > is this a bug or a feature? I do hope the former since it's really bad > behaviour when driving `fossil' with a script. > It's an "as designed bug." The argument handling is based on the argument count, and an empty argument is counted (th

Re: [fossil-users] some questions about fossil-as-document-repo

2013-01-16 Thread C. Thomas Stover
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:37:46 -0600 Carson Chittom wrote: > While I realize that this is a somewhat different emphasis than > fossil's usual orientation, I have suggested to my work superiors > that fossil may be usable for us as a document repository, given its > (lack of) cost and its additional

[fossil-users] timeline bug?

2013-01-16 Thread j. van den hoff
hi, incidentally (when calling fossil from with a script constructing the suitable call) I noted that +fossil timeline ''+ (i.e. appending an empty string '' after `timeline') shows the timeline below (and including *CURRENT*) instead of below the most recent checkin. therefore, output i