Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: commit and close merged leaf

Thus said "Andy Bradford" on 31 Jul 2013 20:37:19 -0600: > It might be a little late in the game, but why is it called integrate? > Maybe I missed the discussion about why it is called that---I'll scour > the archives. After reading the archives it does appear that --integrate, while not quite

Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: commit and close merged leaf

Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:11:52 +0100: > > > Still no objections, anyone? I think it's ready to be integrated into > trunk (using "merge --integrate", of course), but another round of > evaluation never hurts! It

Re: [fossil-users] Q: What Unix / Linux _DISTRIBUTIONS_ Does The Fossil Project "Care About"?

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:05 AM, B Harder wrote: > I'd suggest: fossil is happy to run wherever it can, and strives for > portability wherever it can, whenever it makes sense. > > Any OS is welcome to modify/redistribute fossil in the terms described in > the license. > > It sounds to me (correct

Re: [fossil-users] Q: What Unix / Linux _DISTRIBUTIONS_ Does The Fossil Project "Care About"?

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:05 AM, B Harder wrote: > I'd suggest: fossil is happy to run wherever it can, and strives for > portability wherever it can, whenever it makes sense. > > Any OS is welcome to modify/redistribute fossil in the terms described in > the license. > Well, sure. Portability i

Re: [fossil-users] Inofficial naming contest...

a la libiberty? cc -o foo foo.c -liberty On 7/31/13, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:32 PM, B Harder wrote: > >> I'm going to recycle a project name I've used before: urvogel (the first >> bird), and suggest for its logo: >> http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/birds/archie2.

Re: [fossil-users] Inofficial naming contest...

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:32 PM, B Harder wrote: > I'm going to recycle a project name I've used before: urvogel (the first > bird), and suggest for its logo: > http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/birds/archie2.jpg > Hmmm. That one just doesn't grab me. The more i think about Jeremy's idea th

Re: [fossil-users] Inofficial naming contest...

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Jeremy Anderson wrote: > In that case, why not go with "libbingfossil" :) > If we shorten that to "libingfossil" we're really close to the "living fossil" idea. Not bad. i like it. But the Windows users might not get the joke: ingfossil.dll doesn't have the sam

Re: [fossil-users] Inofficial naming contest...

In that case, why not go with "libbingfossil" :) On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:10 AM, wrote: > On 2013-07-30 06:06, Stephan Beal wrote: > >> >> The obvious choices include: >> >> - libfossil - nothing wrong with that, IMO. >> > > That seems to be the obvious choice. But if you want to get creative

Re: [fossil-users] Inofficial naming contest...

I'm going to recycle a project name I've used before: urvogel (the first bird), and suggest for its logo: http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/birds/archie2.jpg On Jul 30, 2013 3:06 AM, "Stephan Beal" wrote: > Hi, all, > > As most of you know, work has begun on a prototype of what i unfortunatel

[fossil-users] API docs for libfossil prototype are online

Hi, all, FYI: i've posted the API docs for the libfossil prototype code here: http://fossil.wanderinghorse.net/repos/f2/doxygen/ Feedback is always welcomed. i'll try to get those regenerated when there are significant code changes. To build them locally: # cd doc # make doc (requires 'doxyge

Re: [fossil-users] Inofficial naming contest...

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > - libfossil - nothing wrong with that, IMO. > That seems to be the most popular (and arguably the most natural) choice so far, so that's the tentative name until/unless someone proposes something mind-blowing. Thanks for your input! -- --

Re: [fossil-users] Problem with fossil mv

Sorry for the private reply... - Original Message - From: Clark Christensen To: Stephan Beal Cc: Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 11:58 AM Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Problem with fossil mv >The top thread here might (or might not) be interesting: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/search

Re: [fossil-users] Problem with fossil mv

Thus said Clark Christensen on Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:01:58 -0700: > >dir /b/f/s "testfile.txt" > D:\var\fossil\junk\first\testfile.txt > D:\var\fossil\junk\second\testfile.txt > > >fossil mv first/testfile.txt second/testfile.txt > RENAME first/testfile.txt second/testfile.txt Did you forget to mv

Re: [fossil-users] Problem with fossil mv

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Clark Christensen wrote: > >fossil ls -l > EDITED first/testfile.txt > >fossil mv first/testfile.txt second/testfile.txt > RENAME first/testfile.txt second/testfile.txt > Doing a mv on an edited file is a problem that's come up a couple of times over the years

[fossil-users] Problem with fossil mv

>fossil version This is fossil version 1.26 [c9cb6e7293] 2013-06-18 21:09:23 UTC >fossil ls -l EDITED first/testfile.txt >dir /b/f/s "testfile.txt" D:\var\fossil\junk\first\testfile.txt D:\var\fossil\junk\second\testfile.txt >fossil mv first/testfile.txt second/testfile.txt RENAME first/test

Re: [fossil-users] Any objections to renaming /stats_report...

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:09 PM, B Harder wrote: > I personally have no objections, but as a matter of business and > visibility, perhaps do final "last call for objections/alternatives!" on a > business day. > My apologies - i forgot about this. Here's the last reminder - this weekend it'll be

Re: [fossil-users] homepage (first wiki page) for a repository

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Jiri Navratil wrote: > Are you fine with my approach? Could you help me to get them to trunk from > unplanned fork? > Hi! Was the intention really to show the whole URI path to the page? On my system the first entry in the /wiki page looks like: /doc/trunk/www/

Re: [fossil-users] homepage (first wiki page) for a repository

Hello, I did these changes http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/a5a3924abf with intention to get them to trunk. Are you fine with my approach? Could you help me to get them to trunk from unplanned fork? Thank you, Jiri -- Jiri Navratil, http://www.navratil.cz, +420 777 224 245 13. 7. 2

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

On 28/07/2013, at 8:53 AM, Paolo Bolzoni wrote: > Marketing I am afraid ... ... > Of course whoever is interested in selling other languages will mark the C++ > way as older. I respectfully disagree, strongly. Some OO languages support greater degrees of introspection and dynamic type check

[fossil-users] Freebsd tclsh app name is tclsh8.x

Hi all, I use FreeBSD and have encountered a little problem with Tcl doing a fossil diff -tk . In FreeBSD there's no tclsh executable, there are tclsh8.4, tclsh8.5 and tclsh8.6. I know it's a FreeBSD problem and I fixed it creating a softlink from tclsh8.6 to tclsh. The tclsh program name is h

Re: [fossil-users] Q: What Unix / Linux _DISTRIBUTIONS_ Does The Fossil Project "Care About"?

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:05 AM, B Harder wrote: > I'd suggest: fossil is happy to run wherever it can, and strives for > portability wherever it can, whenever it makes sense. > > Any OS is welcome to modify/redistribute fossil in the terms described in > the license. > > It sounds to me (correct