I read this roughly (in fossil-speak) as:
"I had a bunch of email notes from folks requesting I merge their
feature-branches into my main branch, but my machine crashed and my mail
isn't accessible…"
I think auto-sync wouldn't have saved anything, but perhaps the something
like fossils built-in t
Richard Hipp writes:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Martin Gagnon
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I notice from your Release+Build+How+To wiki, you build the OpenBSD
>> release from devious free shell service. I also have an account on devious
>> and I just notice they recently upgrade from OpenBSD 4.7 to
Stephan Beal writes:
> Fossil's testing infrastructure is not as amazing as sqlite's. For each
> release we (normally several of us) run through the following checklist:
>
> http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/test/release-checklist.wiki
Can I just say, the inclusion of OpenBSD on tha
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:45:25 -0400:
> Changed to a more generic "4.x". Updated version numbers for MacOS and
> Linux in the same way.
For OpenBSD it is probably best to just leave the version on which it
was compiled. The libraries are not likely to be present unless so
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote:
>
> I notice from your Release+Build+How+To wiki, you build the OpenBSD
> release from devious free shell service. I also have an account on devious
> and I just notice they recently upgrade from OpenBSD 4.7 to 4.8. So I guess
> we should chan
Versions of OpenBSD before 5.2 are obsolete and unsupported.
On 12 September 2013 10:35, Martin Gagnon wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>> Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been
>> uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.ht
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been
> uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html
>
> I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things
> were compiled the previous time. So p
It appears that autosync would have saved Linus Torvalds from losing some
work yesterday. See
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1309.1/01669.html for
details. Bummer.
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil
[Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:32:10 +0200, Stephan Beal
wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't be interested in logging query-class commands, like
>> fossil ls, fossil status, fossil timeline
>>
>
>Do you mean the SQL code itself?
No, I now realize "query" is a confusing word.
I mean the class of commands
fossil set tracker [on|off] ?
On Sep 11, 2013 2:32 PM, "Stephan Beal" wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Kees Nuyt wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't mind logging the arguments as well, especially for commands
>> that modify the repository or a stash.
>>
>
> i considered it, but the code overhead ju
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Kees Nuyt wrote:
> [Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:32:10 +0200, Stephan Beal
> wrote:
> >> usage -> commandtrace or commandhistory or cmdtrace or cmdhistory
> >
> > i think 3 of those might mess up the column alignment in 'help' ;).
>
> Yeah, I'm happy with 'cmd
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:58 PM, B Harder wrote:
> fossil set tracker [on|off] ?
>
Or 'fossil set cmdhist [on|off]'
Good idea.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fos
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Ron Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:58 PM, B Harder wrote:
>
>> fossil set tracker [on|off] ?
>>
> Or 'fossil set cmdhist [on|off]'
>
i like cmdhist but my fingers don't like typing it :/. cmdhist. Just feels
awkward to type. Kind of like the word "aw
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:58 PM, B Harder wrote:
> fossil set tracker [on|off] ?
>
IIRC "Trac" was Fossil's predecessor for ticket tracking, and "tracker"
always implies tickets to me (as a by-day/by-night developer).
How about...
fossil set nsa-mode on|off
;)
That reminds me (for some reaso
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Kees Nuyt wrote:
> I mean the class of commands that doesn't change anything to a
> repository or a checkout is not interesting for logging.
>
That's a very good point - didn't think of that. We could also do this at
the db level - log them all but then create v
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Kees Nuyt wrote:
> I wouldn't mind logging the arguments as well, especially for commands
> that modify the repository or a stash.
>
i considered it, but the code overhead just wasn't worth it at that time of
night. One of these days i'll miss having that, add i
Hi, all,
Once 1.27 officially goes out the door, i plan on pulling the new 'usage'
command into the trunk (for 1.28). My question to you is: is there anyone
who finds the idea of fossil recording which commands (not their arguments)
and the times of their usage in the local checkout database offen
[Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:58:56 +0200, Stephan Beal
wrote:
>Hi, all,
>
>Once 1.27 officially goes out the door, i plan on pulling the new 'usage'
>command into the trunk (for 1.28). My question to you is: is there anyone
>who finds the idea of fossil recording which commands (not their arg
[Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:03:58 -0400, Richard Hipp
wrote:
>Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been
>uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html
Thanks a ton, Richard!
--
Groet, Cordialement, Pozdrawiam, Regards,
Kees Nuyt
This version works ok.
W dniu 2013-09-11 21:42, Richard Hipp pisze:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Jarek Lewandowski mailto:maxja...@softleg.pl>> wrote:
I have problem with https:
HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support
I new windows binary with SSL support has been
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Jarek Lewandowski wrote:
> I have problem with https:
>
> HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support
>
I new windows binary with SSL support has been uploaded.
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-use
I have problem with https:
HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
On 11 September 2013 11:00, wrote:
> This worked on Windows 2008 R2 64-bit, Windows 7 32-bit, Mountain Lion 10.8.4
> 64-bit.
and Snow Leopard 10.6.8 (and it's i386 so should work everywhere)
Well done! Thanks ../Dave
___
fossil-users mailing list
f
On Windows platform.
W dniu 2013-09-11 21:00, Jarek Lewandowski pisze:
I have problem with https:
HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Matt Welland wrote:
> Sorry, of course the change summary is on the web page. I think it would
> be helpful to paste it into announcement emails.
>
See the bottom half of the download page link he sent:
http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html
--
- stephan
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Matt Welland wrote:
>
> From a quick browse of the timeline it looks like the ssh changes did not
> make it in to this release. What needs to be done to make adding those
> changes to the next release possible?
>
I'd like to start moving those changes into trunk
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Matt Welland wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>> Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been
>> uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html
>>
>> I do this infrequently enough that I keep fo
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been
> uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html
>
> I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things
> were compiled the previous time. So pl
Hi,
11-09-2013 18:40 tarihinde, Hakki Dogusan yazdı:
Hi,
11-09-2013 17:03 tarihinde, Richard Hipp yazdı:
Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been
uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html
[snip]
I'm getting "fossil.exe is not a valid Win32 application"
Hi,
11-09-2013 17:03 tarihinde, Richard Hipp yazdı:
Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been
uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html
I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things
were compiled the previous time. So please try
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:52:44AM -0500, djg...@gmail.com wrote:
> I didn't know there was an official testing document, I just dropped the exe
> in place and ran: fossil server file.fossil
>
> I mostly just use fossil for the wiki which it looked fine so just to clarify
> I just glanced over t
I didn't know there was an official testing document, I just dropped the exe in
place and ran: fossil server file.fossil
I mostly just use fossil for the wiki which it looked fine so just to clarify I
just glanced over the Wiki portion of Fossil and nothing else.
Jonathan Otsuka
On Sep 11, 2013
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Samuel Debionne <
samuel.debio...@ujf-grenoble.fr> wrote:
> The manifest and manifest.uuid is missing from the source tarball.
>
Thanks for the report. This should be fixed now. (Please let me know if
you find otherwise.) I have also updated to release-build w
Thank you for this release.
The manifest and manifest.uuid is missing from the source tarball.
Samuel
Le 11/09/2013 16:03, Richard Hipp a écrit :
> Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been
> uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html
>
> I do this infrequen
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:08:05AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> On 9/11/2013 08:59, John Long wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:49:14AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> >>Only 7 months left of MS support: http://goo.gl/dtpQj4
> >
> >So what?
>
> After the EOL date, XP will quickly start bit rotting
On 11 September 2013 16:36, Michai Ramakers wrote:
> On 11 September 2013 16:03, Richard Hipp wrote:
>>
>> I started a wiki page
>> (http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing
>> how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made
>> for com
This worked on Windows 2008 R2 64-bit, Windows 7 32-bit, Mountain Lion 10.8.4
64-bit.
Jonathan Otuska
On Sep 11, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been
> uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html
>
> I do this
On 9/11/2013 08:36, Michai Ramakers wrote:
For my information: is WinXP still an 'officially supported' platform?
I realise it's a bit old, but I happen to use fossil on that platform,
occasionally.
Only 7 months left of MS support: http://goo.gl/dtpQj4
After that, no more security patches. I
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:49:14AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> On 9/11/2013 08:36, Michai Ramakers wrote:
> >For my information: is WinXP still an 'officially supported' platform?
> >I realise it's a bit old, but I happen to use fossil on that platform,
> >occasionally.
There are plenty of people
2013/9/11 Richard Hipp :
> I don't have a WinXP system to test on. But maybe some of the other
> developers do
WinXP should work fine, I tested fossil 1.25 or so on it.
And as far as I know there are no fundamental differences
in Windows API usage, so it still should work fine.
(If not, you c
On 9/11/2013 08:59, John Long wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:49:14AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
Only 7 months left of MS support: http://goo.gl/dtpQj4
So what?
After the EOL date, XP will quickly start bit rotting. You can predict
the near future by looking at the state of Windows 2000
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Michai Ramakers wrote:
> slightly related question: is there, or will there be, a
> regression-test suite for fossil? (I read about the sqlite testing
> method, which is truly amazing.)
>
Fossil's testing infrastructure is not as amazing as sqlite's. For each
rele
On 11 September 2013 16:03, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been
> uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html
>
> I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were
> compiled the previous time. So please t
Maybe it is time to leave Windows?
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>>
>> Software can't go unmaintained indefinitely without consequences.
>
>
> The primary consequence being that people eventually upgrade ;).
>
>
> --
>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> Software can't go unmaintained indefinitely without consequences.
>
The primary consequence being that people eventually upgrade ;).
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Michai Ramakers wrote:
>
> For my information: is WinXP still an 'officially supported' platform?
> I realise it's a bit old, but I happen to use fossil on that platform,
> occasionally.
>
I don't have a WinXP system to test on. But maybe some of the other
devel
On 11 September 2013 16:03, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> I started a wiki page
> (http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing
> how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made
> for compatibility purposes, please let me know. For example, ...
Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been
uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html
I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things
were compiled the previous time. So please try out the precompiled
binaries and let me know if you enc
48 matches
Mail list logo
