Re: [fossil-users] The "reports" page. Was: Ticket system -- blockers

2013-10-02 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > >> >> Fossil has quite a few contributors: >> >> http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/reports?view=byuser >> >> > It would be really cool if the report above could be specifically for > checki

Re: [fossil-users] typos in docu

2013-10-02 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:21 PM, j. van den hoff > wrote: > >> by the by: what is preferred way of reporting such things these days? the >> mailing list or the ticketing system? > > > The mailing list, please. i'll patch these later today. Tha

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket system -- blockers

2013-10-02 Thread Ron Wilson
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > Most just don't generate as much noise as i do, so you haven't seen them > yet in your short time here ;). > Noise? I'd say you have a very high signal-to-noise ratio. ___ fossil-users mailing li

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket system -- blockers

2013-10-02 Thread Ron Wilson
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Jacek Cała wrote: > in the field (possibly without commas, or a mixture). Ignoring the >> complication of having to parse/grok the content (it's a minor >> complication, granted, but parsing text is always at least a slight >> annoyance), there's another problem:

Re: [fossil-users] The "reports" page. Was: Ticket system -- blockers

2013-10-02 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > >> >> Fossil has quite a few contributors: >> >> http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/reports?view=byuser >> >> > It would be really cool if the report above could be specifically for > checki

[fossil-users] The "reports" page. Was: Ticket system -- blockers

2013-10-02 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > Fossil has quite a few contributors: > > http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/reports?view=byuser > > It would be really cool if the report above could be specifically for checkins or tickets or wiki edits, rather than just for all events. --

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket system -- blockers

2013-10-02 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Krister Johnson wrote: > I just started using fossil. It is heartening to see there are so many > people contributing. > Fossil has quite a few contributors: http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/reports?view=byuser Most just don't generate as much noise as i do, so

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket system -- blockers

2013-10-02 Thread Krister Johnson
Jacek, I just started using fossil. It is heartening to see there are so many people contributing. I haven't run into that need yet, but it doesn't mean i won't. Thanks for putting this out there. I will know where to find it if that need arises. Krister On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Jacek C

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket system -- blockers

2013-10-02 Thread Jacek Cała
> > in the field (possibly without commas, or a mixture). Ignoring the > complication of having to parse/grok the content (it's a minor > complication, granted, but parsing text is always at least a slight > annoyance), there's another problem: DVCS. i edit the field, then you close > the ticket in

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket system -- blockers

2013-10-02 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Jacek Cała wrote: > I'd say it is as simple as it sounds: it just blocks another ticket from > closing, meaning that when you look at the view page and see some blockers > you may want first to check whether they've already been closed. > In that case, what happen

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket system -- blockers

2013-10-02 Thread Jacek Cała
2013/10/2 Stephan Beal > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Jacek Cała wrote: > >> ...For those interested I report changes to the ticket table (below) and >> view and edit pages (attached source). A remaining issue is that as >> there're no hard db constraints on blockers there seems to be no way

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket system -- blockers

2013-10-02 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Jacek Cała wrote: > ...For those interested I report changes to the ticket table (below) and > view and edit pages (attached source). A remaining issue is that as > there're no hard db constraints on blockers there seems to be no way to > verify that the blocker to

[fossil-users] Ticket system -- blockers

2013-10-02 Thread Jacek Cała
Hi all, About 4 years ago I wrote about a missing feature -- a way to specify that a ticket is a blocker of another ticket. There was a useful suggestion from Brian T... time passed and recently this feature has become more and more urgent to me, so I decided to implement it. For those interested

Re: [fossil-users] typos in docu

2013-10-02 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:21 PM, j. van den hoff wrote: > by the by: what is preferred way of reporting such things these days? the > mailing list or the ticketing system? The mailing list, please. i'll patch these later today. Thanks! -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stepha

[fossil-users] typos in docu

2013-10-02 Thread j. van den hoff
there are some typos in the documentation here: http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/server.wiki in the `fossil as cgi' section. the trailing part of the section should read (corrections are bracketed by `***'): 8<-- To ***serve*** multip