On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Joseph R. Justice jayare...@gmail.comwrote:
During the push, it is noticed that R(N) says bug B2 is closed while R'
says it is open and blocked by B1 (and that A specified the block), which
is open both in R' and R(N). N should be notified of this as it is
Hi all,
we've been using Fossil 1.24 as storage system for generated files in
our environment for quite some time now.
Recently, we decided to update from 1.24 to 1.27. When deciding whether
to do the update or not, I read through all the ChangeLogs on the
website and I made sure that all
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Stefan Bellon sbel...@sbellon.de wrote:
Previously, with fossil 1.24, the third column of the annotate output
was the author who did the most recent change to the line. Now, with
fossil 1.27, it's just the line number being displayed.
First of all, this
Hello,
There's a jan-httpsproxytunnel (work-in-progress) branch with support
for tunneling https over a http proxy.
I have done a few https-over-http-proxy clones, and I also made some
https (without proxy) clones to see if I broke anything. I have however
not done extensive testing, so ..
On Mon, 07 Oct, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Stefan Bellon sbel...@sbellon.de
wrote:
Previously, with fossil 1.24, the third column of the annotate
output was the author who did the most recent change to the line.
Now, with fossil 1.27, it's just the line number
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Stefan Bellon sbel...@sbellon.de wrote:
On Mon, 07 Oct, Richard Hipp wrote: Most people are more interested in
the fact that the line changed.
The identity of the editor is of secondary importance,
I beg to differ strongly. The command is called annotate and
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Stefan Bellon sbel...@sbellon.de wrote:
The username was therefore removed from the primary display in order
to reduce the amount of clutter and to make the output easier for
humans to read.
Was this discussed on the mailing list and I missed it? Or was
Fossil has never guaranteed specific output for any given command, ...~
The output of any and all commands is subject to change without notice
between any given versions. As a general rule, whoever hacks the feature
determines the output format. i would go so far as to say that Fossil's
output has
Applying constraints as receiver end filtering could be very useful and I
think it could fit the sync model if not needed blobs were not necessarily
dropped but a record was kept so that they wouldn't be sync'd and they are
kept out of the list of blobs. Essentially something similar to what the
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:27 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess the library interface is the target moving forward instead of
forcing standardized output?
Good question. Ideally the library will produce _no_ text output other than
the propagation of error messages from lower levels (e.g.
Very nice.
My initial thoughts were to reproduce the existing fossil cmds but you are
correct that this should not be the library's sole purpose.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:27 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess the
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Jakob Eriksson ja...@aurorasystems.euwrote:
Of course you have no obligations but I think Fossil is getting more
popular. That means you will break more people's scripts and expectations.
Just something to consider.
OTOH, anyone who takes the time to ask on
For each person taking that time, there will be 1000 more not taking that time.
That said, you are intentionally leaving a gap between human interaction and a
library, and that gap is classic Unix scripting with stdout and stdin.
Of course one could build a stable text interface automation
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Stefan Bellon sbel...@sbellon.de wrote:
But more severely, the information
who changed the line is now not present anymore at all.
Most people are more interested in the fact that the line
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Jakob Eriksson ja...@aurorasystems.euwrote:
Of course you have no obligations but I think Fossil is getting more
popular. That means you will break more people's scripts and expectations.
Just something to consider.
There is tension between preserving
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andreas Kupries andre...@activestate.comwrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
Most people are more interested in the fact that the line changed. The
identity of the editor is of secondary importance,
Not when you have
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andreas Kupries andre...@activestate.com
wrote:
(*) With bisect we have the change, and this know who made it. However
sometimes it is possible to determine a problematic line without
Losing the username in annotate command line is a big hit for me. I don't
understand why that would be removed. Is this driven by Windows users who
are stuck with limited terminal width? You could shave off some characters
by only printing the first 4 letters of the node id. Also the : at the end
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:
Losing the username in annotate command line is a big hit for me. I don't
understand why that would be removed.
From Richard's comment, I surmise he (and others) mostly use the web
version of annotate, where clicking on
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym
ala...@snell-pym.org.ukwrote:
I've written a backup/archival tool based on content-addressible
storage, and a common question people ask is So why don't I just put my
home directory/entire filesystem in git, then?, and I have to raise
this
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:
Applying constraints as receiver end filtering could be very useful and I
think it could fit the sync model if not needed blobs were not necessarily
dropped but a record was kept so that they wouldn't be sync'd and they
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Joseph R. Justice jayare...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym ala...@snell-pym.org.uk
wrote:
I've written a backup/archival tool based on content-addressible
storage, and a common question people ask is So why don't I just put
22 matches
Mail list logo
