On 03/02/15 05:50, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
[...]
> Agreed. I'm also of the opinion that this is a good change and I have no
> objections to it.
Awesome. I merged it as [6fedb84abb] and closed the branch. Let me know
if there are any problems.
...BTW, while testing I noticed the new file viewer wit
Better.
-bch
On 2/3/15, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Please try again and let me know if the fix I checked in has cleared
> the problem. Tnx.
>
> On 2/3/15, bch wrote:
>> On the fossil site:
>>
>> SQLITE_ERROR: no such function: stext
>>
>> SQLITE_ERROR: statement aborts at 26: [DELETE FROM ftsidx W
Please try again and let me know if the fix I checked in has cleared
the problem. Tnx.
On 2/3/15, bch wrote:
> On the fossil site:
>
> SQLITE_ERROR: no such function: stext
>
> SQLITE_ERROR: statement aborts at 26: [DELETE FROM ftsidx WHERE docid
> IN (SELECT rowid FROM ftsdocs WHERE type='t' A
On the fossil site:
SQLITE_ERROR: no such function: stext
SQLITE_ERROR: statement aborts at 26: [DELETE FROM ftsidx WHERE docid
IN (SELECT rowid FROM ftsdocs WHERE type='t' AND rid=1088 AND idxed)]
Database Error
SQL logic error or missing database: {DELETE FROM ftsidx WHERE docid
IN(SELECT
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> After sending that prior message, I did think of a way to allow retries
> without inconsistency, but it would surely slow Fossil down: there could be
> a mode that turns cloning into a replay of the master repo’s timeline.
>
> That is, every c
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:48:52PM +0100, Jan Danielsson wrote:
>In terms of the type of data, our data and fossil's data is very
> different, but in terms of the time it takes to synchronize large data
> stores/repositories, we're in the exact same situation. We don't expect
> synchronization
On 02/02/15 23:23, Warren Young wrote:
>> The annoying thing is that when it fails, it wipes away whatever
>> progress it has made.
> Yes, well, that’s the nature of transactional DB updates: all or nothing.
Implied: There's only one way to use transactions when performing
initial synchroniza
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vujnqzgx3iaiu64/fossil.exe?dl=0
From: Richard Boehme
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 1:58 PM
To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] New search features
Does anyone have a Windows binary of the latest fossil with search? I don't
have the ability
Does anyone have a Windows binary of the latest fossil with search? I don't
have the ability to compile it from where I am at the moment.
Thanks.
Richard
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:41 AM, jungle Boogie
wrote:
> Dr. Hipp,
> On 2 February 2015 at 22:11, Richard Hipp wrote:
> > On 2/3/15, jungle
9 matches
Mail list logo