Re: [fossil-users] configure reset skin resets too much

2015-02-03 Thread David Given
On 03/02/15 05:50, Joe Mistachkin wrote: [...] > Agreed. I'm also of the opinion that this is a good change and I have no > objections to it. Awesome. I merged it as [6fedb84abb] and closed the branch. Let me know if there are any problems. ...BTW, while testing I noticed the new file viewer wit

Re: [fossil-users] DB error updating ticket

2015-02-03 Thread bch
Better. -bch On 2/3/15, Richard Hipp wrote: > Please try again and let me know if the fix I checked in has cleared > the problem. Tnx. > > On 2/3/15, bch wrote: >> On the fossil site: >> >> SQLITE_ERROR: no such function: stext >> >> SQLITE_ERROR: statement aborts at 26: [DELETE FROM ftsidx W

Re: [fossil-users] DB error updating ticket

2015-02-03 Thread Richard Hipp
Please try again and let me know if the fix I checked in has cleared the problem. Tnx. On 2/3/15, bch wrote: > On the fossil site: > > SQLITE_ERROR: no such function: stext > > SQLITE_ERROR: statement aborts at 26: [DELETE FROM ftsidx WHERE docid > IN (SELECT rowid FROM ftsdocs WHERE type='t' A

[fossil-users] DB error updating ticket

2015-02-03 Thread bch
On the fossil site: SQLITE_ERROR: no such function: stext SQLITE_ERROR: statement aborts at 26: [DELETE FROM ftsidx WHERE docid IN (SELECT rowid FROM ftsdocs WHERE type='t' AND rid=1088 AND idxed)] Database Error SQL logic error or missing database: {DELETE FROM ftsidx WHERE docid IN(SELECT

Re: [fossil-users] Old problem not entirely gone?

2015-02-03 Thread Ron W
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Warren Young wrote: > After sending that prior message, I did think of a way to allow retries > without inconsistency, but it would surely slow Fossil down: there could be > a mode that turns cloning into a replay of the master repo’s timeline. > > That is, every c

Re: [fossil-users] Old problem not entirely gone?

2015-02-03 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:48:52PM +0100, Jan Danielsson wrote: >In terms of the type of data, our data and fossil's data is very > different, but in terms of the time it takes to synchronize large data > stores/repositories, we're in the exact same situation. We don't expect > synchronization

Re: [fossil-users] Old problem not entirely gone?

2015-02-03 Thread Jan Danielsson
On 02/02/15 23:23, Warren Young wrote: >> The annoying thing is that when it fails, it wipes away whatever >> progress it has made. > Yes, well, that’s the nature of transactional DB updates: all or nothing. Implied: There's only one way to use transactions when performing initial synchroniza

Re: [fossil-users] New search features

2015-02-03 Thread tonyp
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vujnqzgx3iaiu64/fossil.exe?dl=0 From: Richard Boehme Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 1:58 PM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] New search features Does anyone have a Windows binary of the latest fossil with search? I don't have the ability

Re: [fossil-users] New search features

2015-02-03 Thread Richard Boehme
Does anyone have a Windows binary of the latest fossil with search? I don't have the ability to compile it from where I am at the moment. Thanks. Richard On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:41 AM, jungle Boogie wrote: > Dr. Hipp, > On 2 February 2015 at 22:11, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 2/3/15, jungle