Re: [fossil-users] git LFS

2015-10-27 Thread Barry Arthur
If you don't want to pollute your fossil repository with LBFs, you could use a similar approach to git's lfs solution by storing the actual files in Dropbox or boar (https://bitbucket.org/mats_ekberg/boar/wiki/Home) and text-linking to them from within your fossil-managed repo. I haven't tried eith

Re: [fossil-users] git LFS

2015-10-27 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:01:09PM -0400, Ron W wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Abilio Marques wrote: > ... > > > As far as I can see, binary files get uploaded into a web server using > > PUT, and then a reference is made into the repo. That way git doesn't deal > > with useless DIFFs

Re: [fossil-users] git LFS

2015-10-27 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Abilio Marques wrote: ... > As far as I can see, binary files get uploaded into a web server using > PUT, and then a reference is made into the repo. That way git doesn't deal > with useless DIFFs of such files. Then, when a checkout is made, it > downloads the fi

[fossil-users] git LFS

2015-10-27 Thread Abilio Marques
Yeah, I know, this is about fossil, but I want to mention this, at it seems an useful idea for people who uses binary files all the time. https://git-lfs.github.com/ As far as I can see, binary files get uploaded into a web server using PUT, and then a reference is made into the repo. That way gi