On 15 December 2015 at 18:49, Richard Hipp wrote:
> I've had that cartoon on the Fossil website since it came out.
> http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/quotes.wiki - item 10.
> But I suppose it is buried pretty deeply in the documentation, where
> it is hard to find
That's right.
On 12/15/15, jungle Boogie wrote:
>
> I say let them think what they want. This is how mistakes are
> corrected in git: http://xkcd.com/1597/
I've had that cartoon on the Fossil website since it came out.
http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/quotes.wiki - item 10.
But I suppose it is bu
On 15 December 2015 at 08:04, Warren Young wrote:
> Either my understanding of fossil shun is just as weak as my understanding of
> git rebase, or this is a false equivalency, and we can’t have [people getting
> away with being wrong on the Internet][1]. :)
I say let them think what they want.
On 12/15/15, Paul Higham wrote:
> I am trying to get a .html file to show up in a Fossil wiki as embedded
> documentation. There is an instruction that says to put the following
> at the beginning of the .html file to have the header and footer displayed:
>
>
>
> which I have dutifully don
I am trying to get a .html file to show up in a Fossil wiki as embedded documentation. There is an instruction that says to put the followingat the beginning of the .html file to have the header and footer displayed: which I have dutifully done including the end tag. However the Fossil header and
Thus said Warren Young on Tue, 15 Dec 2015 09:04:40 -0700:
> Could someone who understand ``git rebase'' weigh in on that thread?
> People are claiming that ``fossil shun'' means there is no difference
> between Git and Fossil.
Add to that the claim that ``autosync'' is equivalent to rew
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 12/15/15, Warren Young wrote:
> > On Dec 15, 2015, at 5:54 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> >>
> >> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10737131
> >
> > Could someone who understands “git rebase” weigh in on that thread?
> People
> > are claim
On Dec 15, 2015, at 10:33 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
>
> git: "History is written by the victors."
>
> fossil: "History is recorded as it happens.”
I’m not the one who needs convincing. These replies need to be comments on the
Hacker News post, not replies to my request for clarification.
Those
git: "History is written by the victors."
fossil: "History is recorded as it happens."
- stephan beal, sgb...@googlemail.com
Written on a keyboard attached to a telephone attached to a TV screen, via
an app written for use on touchscreens. Please excuse brevity, typos, and
whatnot.
On Dec 15,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Warren Young wrote:
> Could someone who understands “git rebase” weigh in on that thread?
> People are claiming that “fossil shun” means there is no difference between
> Git and Fossil.
>
> Either my understanding of fossil shun is just as weak as my understandin
I also mentioned it on our 'Code Thoughts' forum:
https://codethoughts.org/index.php/topic,6.0.html
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
On 12/15/15, Warren Young wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2015, at 5:54 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>>
>> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10737131
>
> Could someone who understands “git rebase” weigh in on that thread? People
> are claiming that “fossil shun” means there is no difference between Git and
>
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 09:04:40 -0700
Warren Young wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2015, at 5:54 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> >
> > https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10737131
>
> Could someone who understands “git rebase” weigh in on that thread?
> People are claiming that “fossil shun” means there is no dif
On Dec 15, 2015, at 5:54 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10737131
Could someone who understands “git rebase” weigh in on that thread? People are
claiming that “fossil shun” means there is no difference between Git and Fossil.
Either my understanding of fossil
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10737131
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:30 AM, David Vines
wrote:
> Okay, thanks for confirming that.
>
> I'll take a look at source code and see if I can modify it as suggested.
> Despite my C knowledge being a little rusty (nearly two decades since I
> last did serious work in C) it doesn't look too difficu
On 14/12/2015 15:20, Richard Hipp wrote:
I don't recall anybody ever writing such commands. There is nothing
technically difficult about doing so - I just don't think the need has
come up before.
The technote code is in the event.c source file. You can use the
"wiki" command implement in "wik
17 matches
Mail list logo
